From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] Make 'not ok $count - $message' consistent with 'ok $count - $message' Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:50:36 -0400 Message-ID: <20120919175036.GB11699@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1348074915-19985-1-git-send-email-git@adamspiers.org> <1348074915-19985-3-git-send-email-git@adamspiers.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git list , Junio C Hamano To: Adam Spiers X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Sep 19 19:50:49 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TEOQB-00044O-Rw for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:50:48 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932805Ab2ISRuj (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:50:39 -0400 Received: from 75-15-5-89.uvs.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([75.15.5.89]:49768 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932717Ab2ISRui (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:50:38 -0400 Received: (qmail 2539 invoked by uid 107); 19 Sep 2012 17:51:03 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:51:03 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:50:36 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1348074915-19985-3-git-send-email-git@adamspiers.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 06:15:11PM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote: > test_failure_ () { > test_failure=$(($test_failure + 1)) > - say_color error "not ok - $test_count $1" > + say_color error "not ok $test_count - $1" Interesting. I wondered what TAP had to say about this, and in fact we were doing it wrong before. However, since the test numbers are optional in TAP, a harness is supposed to keep its own counter when we fail to provide a number. So it happened to work, but this change in fact makes us more TAP-compliant. Good. -Peff