git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>
Cc: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com>,
	git list <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make test output coloring more intuitive
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:13:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120919201326.GA23016@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120919201201.GD19246@atlantic.linksys.moosehall>

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:12:01PM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:

> > > Sounds reasonable, and I think the new output looks nice. I notice that
> > > skipped tests are still in green. I wonder if they should be in yellow,
> > > too.
> > >
> > What about blue instead?   This would keep the colouring scheme more
> > consistent with the one used by prove:
> >   <http://search.cpan.org/~ovid/Test-Harness/bin/prove>
> > by autotest:
> >   <http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf.html#Using-Autotest>
> > and by the Automake-generated test harness:
> >   <http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/automake.html#Scripts_002dbased-Testsuites>
> 
> Sounds good to me!  Blue is the conventional color for informational
> signs, so seems like a natural fit for skipped tests.  Not sure
> whether it should be bold or not though?  I'll wait for a more solid
> group consensus before re-rolling yet another patch :-)

Blue would be fine with me. No strong opinion on bold or not (my gut is
that most things should not be bold unless there is a good reason, but
that is just a feeling).

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-19 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-17 11:50 [PATCH] Make test output coloring more intuitive Adam Spiers
2012-09-17 20:11 ` Jeff King
2012-09-18 21:21   ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 20:02   ` Stefano Lattarini
2012-09-19 20:12     ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 20:13       ` Jeff King [this message]
2012-09-19 20:24         ` [PATCH v4 3/6] Color skipped tests blue Adam Spiers
2012-09-20  5:48           ` Johannes Sixt
2012-09-20  9:04             ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-20  9:08             ` [PATCH v5 3/3] Color skipped tests bold blue Adam Spiers
2012-09-20 10:08               ` Stefano Lattarini
2012-09-20 16:20                 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-09-21  6:13           ` [PATCH v4 3/6] Color skipped tests blue Jeff King
2012-11-11  2:04             ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-17 20:50 ` [PATCH] Make test output coloring more intuitive Junio C Hamano
2012-09-18 21:36   ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-18 21:59     ` Jeff King
2012-09-18 22:14       ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15     ` [PATCH v2 0/6] make " Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 1/6] Change the color of individual known breakages Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 2/6] Make 'not ok $count - $message' consistent with 'ok $count - $message' Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:50         ` Jeff King
2012-09-19 23:39         ` Junio C Hamano
2012-09-19 23:45           ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 3/6] Color skipped tests the same as informational messages Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 4/6] Refactor mechanics of testing in a sub test-lib Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:56         ` Jeff King
2012-09-19 18:44           ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 18:49             ` [PATCH v3 " Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 18:49               ` [PATCH v3 5/6] Test the test framework more thoroughly Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 18:49               ` [PATCH v3 6/6] Treat unexpectedly fixed known breakages more seriously Adam Spiers
2012-09-20 21:13               ` [PATCH v3 4/6] Refactor mechanics of testing in a sub test-lib Junio C Hamano
2012-09-19 19:37             ` [PATCH v2 " Jeff King
2012-09-19 20:15               ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 5/6] Test the test framework more thoroughly Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 6/6] Treat unexpectedly fixed known breakages more seriously Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 18:05       ` [PATCH v2 0/6] make test output coloring more intuitive Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120919201326.GA23016@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@adamspiers.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefano.lattarini@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).