git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>
Cc: git list <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] Color skipped tests blue
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 02:13:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120921061325.GA15867@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348086263-27555-1-git-send-email-git@adamspiers.org>

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:24:23PM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:

>  t/test-lib.sh | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
> index 5293830..78c88c2 100755
> --- a/t/test-lib.sh
> +++ b/t/test-lib.sh
> @@ -182,13 +182,13 @@ then
>  		error)
>  			tput bold; tput setaf 1;; # bold red
>  		skip)
> -			tput bold; tput setaf 2;; # bold green
> +			tput setaf 4;;            # blue
>  		warn)
>  			tput bold; tput setaf 3;; # bold yellow
>  		pass)
>  			tput setaf 2;;            # green
>  		info)
> -			tput setaf 3;;            # brown
> +			tput setaf 3;;            # yellow/brown

I happened to be running a test script with "-v" earlier today, and I
noticed that the "expecting success..." dump of the test contents is
also yellow. By your new rules, shouldn't it be blue?

I think it is matching the "info" type, which from the discussion should
be blue, no?

Maybe it is just my terminal. I see it is labeled as "brown" here, but
it looks very yellow (and I am using the stock xterm colors. According
to:

  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_colors

It looks it really is brown on some platforms. I'm not sure if it is
worth worrying about.  I don't really want to get into configurable
colors just for the test-suite output.

-Peff

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-21  6:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-17 11:50 [PATCH] Make test output coloring more intuitive Adam Spiers
2012-09-17 20:11 ` Jeff King
2012-09-18 21:21   ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 20:02   ` Stefano Lattarini
2012-09-19 20:12     ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 20:13       ` Jeff King
2012-09-19 20:24         ` [PATCH v4 3/6] Color skipped tests blue Adam Spiers
2012-09-20  5:48           ` Johannes Sixt
2012-09-20  9:04             ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-20  9:08             ` [PATCH v5 3/3] Color skipped tests bold blue Adam Spiers
2012-09-20 10:08               ` Stefano Lattarini
2012-09-20 16:20                 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-09-21  6:13           ` Jeff King [this message]
2012-11-11  2:04             ` [PATCH v4 3/6] Color skipped tests blue Adam Spiers
2012-09-17 20:50 ` [PATCH] Make test output coloring more intuitive Junio C Hamano
2012-09-18 21:36   ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-18 21:59     ` Jeff King
2012-09-18 22:14       ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15     ` [PATCH v2 0/6] make " Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 1/6] Change the color of individual known breakages Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 2/6] Make 'not ok $count - $message' consistent with 'ok $count - $message' Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:50         ` Jeff King
2012-09-19 23:39         ` Junio C Hamano
2012-09-19 23:45           ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 3/6] Color skipped tests the same as informational messages Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 4/6] Refactor mechanics of testing in a sub test-lib Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:56         ` Jeff King
2012-09-19 18:44           ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 18:49             ` [PATCH v3 " Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 18:49               ` [PATCH v3 5/6] Test the test framework more thoroughly Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 18:49               ` [PATCH v3 6/6] Treat unexpectedly fixed known breakages more seriously Adam Spiers
2012-09-20 21:13               ` [PATCH v3 4/6] Refactor mechanics of testing in a sub test-lib Junio C Hamano
2012-09-19 19:37             ` [PATCH v2 " Jeff King
2012-09-19 20:15               ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 5/6] Test the test framework more thoroughly Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 6/6] Treat unexpectedly fixed known breakages more seriously Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 18:05       ` [PATCH v2 0/6] make test output coloring more intuitive Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120921061325.GA15867@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@adamspiers.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=stefano.lattarini@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).