From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>
Cc: GitList <git@vger.kernel.org>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Doc format-patch: clarify --notes use case
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:26:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121026132657.GH1455@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7427D8D31835443F96156C24D3EB6A5A@PhilipOakley>
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:48:04PM +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
> >+the commit that does not belong to the commit log message proper,
> >+and include it with the patch submission. While one can simply write
> >+these explanations after `format-patch` has run but before sending,
> >+keeping them as git notes allows them to be maintained between
> >versions
> >+of the patch series (but see the discussion of the `notes.rewrite.*`
> >+configuration in linkgit:git-notes[1] to use this workflow).
>
> Should the notes.rewriteRef also be mentioned (not part of .*), which
> is at the end of the notes configuration and that it must be set may
> be missed by readers? Perhaps "the 'notes.rewrite' configurations",
> dropping the .* and making it plural?
Yeah, I think just saying "notes.rewrite" is better. The notes.rewrite.*
entry does point to rewriteRef, but there is no point in giving the user
a trail of "see also" breadcrumbs when we can just point them to the
area as a whole.
I updated it to this:
diff --git a/Documentation/git-format-patch.txt b/Documentation/git-format-patch.txt
index 066dc8b..259dce4 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-format-patch.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-format-patch.txt
@@ -196,13 +196,12 @@ The expected use case of this is to write supporting explanation for
after the three-dash line.
+
The expected use case of this is to write supporting explanation for
-the commit that does not belong to the commit log message proper
-when (or after) you create the commit, and include it in your patch
-submission. But if you can plan ahead and write it down, there may
-not be a good reason not to write it in your commit message, and if
-you can't, you can always edit the output of format-patch before
-sending it out, so the practical value of this option is somewhat
-dubious, unless your workflow is broken.
+the commit that does not belong to the commit log message proper,
+and include it with the patch submission. While one can simply write
+these explanations after `format-patch` has run but before sending,
+keeping them as git notes allows them to be maintained between versions
+of the patch series (but see the discussion of the `notes.rewrite`
+configuration options in linkgit:git-notes[1] to use this workflow).
--[no]-signature=<signature>::
Add a signature to each message produced. Per RFC 3676 the signature
--
1.8.0.3.g3456896
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-26 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-21 21:34 [PATCH] Doc SubmittingPatches: Mention --notes option after "cover letter" Philip Oakley
2012-10-21 21:34 ` [PATCH] Doc User-Manual: Patch cover letter, three dashes, and --notes Philip Oakley
2012-10-25 10:26 ` Jeff King
2012-10-25 22:45 ` Philip Oakley
2012-10-21 21:34 ` [PATCH] Doc notes: Include the format-patch --notes option Philip Oakley
2012-10-21 21:34 ` [PATCH] Doc format-patch: clarify --notes use case Philip Oakley
2012-10-25 10:25 ` Jeff King
2012-10-25 22:48 ` Philip Oakley
2012-10-26 13:26 ` Jeff King [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121026132657.GH1455@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=philipoakley@iee.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).