From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] test-lib: avoid full path to store test results Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:20:51 -0400 Message-ID: <20121102152051.GB24622@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1351570377-894-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <20121030044609.GA10873@elie.Belkin> <20121031012730.GY15167@elie.Belkin> <20121031021318.GB15167@elie.Belkin> <509167C8.6090600@kdbg.org> <20121102131726.GC2598@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Johannes Sixt , Jonathan Nieder , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= To: Felipe Contreras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 02 16:21:07 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TUJ3S-0002e0-TJ for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:21:07 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757314Ab2KBPUy (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:20:54 -0400 Received: from 75-15-5-89.uvs.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([75.15.5.89]:54628 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753591Ab2KBPUy (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:20:54 -0400 Received: (qmail 5696 invoked by uid 107); 2 Nov 2012 15:21:37 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:21:37 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:20:51 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 04:17:27PM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > And me, who is trying to figure out what to do with this patch. It is > > presented on its own, outside of a series, with only the description "no > > reason not to do this". > > Yeah, because I think it stands on its own. But I'll include it in the > remote-hg patch series, I already have it queued up. Thanks. -Peff