From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] push/pull: adjust missing upstream help text to changed interface Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 05:44:00 -0500 Message-ID: <20121107104359.GA6830@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <00F68AED-5D59-44F2-B0F1-E541881BC2CB@uva.nl> <03ff9252-71dc-4c28-a542-d65d16ba6549@email.android.com> <509A1A4E.5060805@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeroen van der Ham To: Michael J Gruber X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 07 11:44:23 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TW37O-0001sy-1A for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:44:22 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753914Ab2KGKoH (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2012 05:44:07 -0500 Received: from 75-15-5-89.uvs.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([75.15.5.89]:33310 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751300Ab2KGKoG (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2012 05:44:06 -0500 Received: (qmail 16226 invoked by uid 107); 7 Nov 2012 10:44:49 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 05:44:49 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 07 Nov 2012 05:44:00 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <509A1A4E.5060805@drmicha.warpmail.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 09:22:38AM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 06.11.2012 15:45: > > > > > > Michael J Gruber wrote: > > > >> Yes, I'm in low hanging fruits mood. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber > > > > It is called tying loose ends, and is very important. Very much appreciated. > > ;) > > By the way: The gotcha with the signed-off-by after the note is due to > my old format-patch-notes being tripped up by the recent restructuring; > your version in next get's it right. I've dumped my old branch, and I > hope the maintainer in chief will shuffle around the s-o-b where it belongs. Yes, will do. Thanks. -Peff