From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2012, #02; Fri, 9) Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 15:10:57 -0500 Message-ID: <20121109201057.GA11368@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20121109192336.GA9401@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Ralf Thielow X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 09 21:11:15 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TWuv3-0001Yb-Ud for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 21:11:14 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755560Ab2KIUK7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2012 15:10:59 -0500 Received: from 75-15-5-89.uvs.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([75.15.5.89]:40380 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753603Ab2KIUK7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2012 15:10:59 -0500 Received: (qmail 10898 invoked by uid 107); 9 Nov 2012 20:11:45 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:11:45 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:10:57 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:06:47PM +0100, Ralf Thielow wrote: > > It seems that the repo doesn't contain the integration branches?!? > > > > $ git remote add peff git://github.com/peff/git.git > > $ git fetch -v peff > > From git://github.com/peff/git > > * [new branch] maint -> peff/maint > > * [new branch] master -> peff/master > > * [new branch] next -> peff/next > > * [new branch] pu -> peff/pu > > * [new branch] todo -> peff/todo > > $ > > But "integration branches" means "master", "next" and "pu" than I haven't > said anything. ;) Sorry for the noise. Right. :) I have not been pushing the individual topic branches to make life easier for people who usually just track Junio's kernel.org repository, and would not welcome suddenly getting a hundred extra remote branches. I can make them public if it makes life easier for people, but it may not be worth it at this point, with Junio returning soon. -Peff