From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>,
Ilya Basin <basinilya@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] git-sh-setup: refactor ident-parsing functions
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:12:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121112201235.GA7210@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vzk2mh9dm.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:08:37PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>
> > Changing the interface for get_author_ident_from_commit would be a pain,
> > but if we just wanted to help filter-branch, we could do something like
> > this:
>
> Yes, that is the direction I was alluding to.
>
> Callers of get_author_ident_from_commit can also do the same and
> avoid rebuilding the same $pick_author_script over and over again,
> or get_author_ident_from_commit can do so for its callers.
I don't think get_author_ident_from_commit can do so on demand due to
the subshell issue I mentioned. So you'd have to generate the pick
script on inclusion of git-sh-setup, whether the includer wants to call
the function or not.
I wonder if we should simply generate these at build time and store them
in the script.
I'm also not sure that saving one process invocation is worth spending a
lot of thought cycles on. Maybe somebody on Windows could run a
filter-branch with the patch I just sent and measure whether it even
makes a difference.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-12 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-17 6:47 What can cause empty GIT_AUTHOR_NAME for 'git filter-branch --tree-filter' on Solaris? Ilya Basin
2012-10-17 7:18 ` Jeff King
2012-10-17 7:23 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-10-17 8:58 ` Re[2]: " Ilya Basin
2012-10-17 10:36 ` Re[3]: " Ilya Basin
2012-10-17 22:13 ` Jeff King
2012-10-17 22:09 ` Jeff King
2012-10-18 5:31 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-10-18 5:36 ` Jeff King
2012-10-18 6:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-10-18 6:08 ` Jeff King
2012-10-18 7:22 ` [PATCH 0/2] clean up filter-branch ident parsing Jeff King
2012-10-18 7:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] git-sh-setup: refactor ident-parsing functions Jeff King
2012-11-12 17:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-11-12 19:44 ` Jeff King
2012-11-12 20:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-11-12 20:12 ` Jeff King [this message]
2012-11-12 20:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-10-18 7:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] filter-branch: use git-sh-setup's ident parsing functions Jeff King
2012-10-18 7:49 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-10-18 7:54 ` Jeff King
2012-10-18 10:22 ` Jeff King
2012-10-18 10:26 ` Jeff King
2012-10-18 10:33 ` [PATCHv2 " Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121112201235.GA7210@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=basinilya@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).