From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/5] t9001: check send-email behavior with implicit sender
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:17:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121128201713.GA9249@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121128200626.GA4292@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 03:06:26PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> Here's a cleaned up version that makes it more obvious the commands are
> the same (it also fixes a few minor whitespace problems on the
> indentation, which you can see from the quoting above).
I wondered how painful it would be to actually run the command and then
conditionally check the results inside the test. I ended up with this:
diff --git a/t/t9001-send-email.sh b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
index c5d66cf..9c8fac1 100755
--- a/t/t9001-send-email.sh
+++ b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
@@ -201,6 +201,30 @@ test_expect_success $PREREQ 'Prompting works' '
grep "^To: to@example.com\$" msgtxt1
'
+test_expect_success $PREREQ 'handle implicit ident' '
+ clean_fake_sendmail &&
+ (
+ sane_unset GIT_AUTHOR_NAME &&
+ sane_unset GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL &&
+ sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_NAME &&
+ sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL &&
+ GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY=1 && export GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY &&
+ {
+ git send-email \
+ --smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
+ --to=to@example.com \
+ $patches </dev/null 2>errors;
+ exit_code=$?
+ } &&
+ if test_have_prereq AUTOIDENT; then
+ test $exit_code = 0
+ else
+ test $exit_code != 0 &&
+ test_i18ngrep "tell me who you are" errors
+ fi
+ )
+'
+
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'tocmd works' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
cp $patches tocmd.patch &&
which does work, though it is less nice that the protections and nice
syntax of "test_must_fail" must be abandoned (unless we want to do
something horrible like 'test_must_fail sh -c "exit $exit_code"'.
I could go either way.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-28 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-28 18:25 [PATCH 0/5] jk/send-email-sender-prompt loose ends Jeff King
2012-11-28 18:25 ` [PATCH 1/5] test-lib: allow negation of prerequisites Jeff King
2012-11-28 18:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] t7502: factor out autoident prerequisite Jeff King
2012-11-28 18:26 ` [PATCH 3/5] ident: make user_ident_explicitly_given static Jeff King
2012-11-28 18:26 ` [PATCH 4/5] ident: keep separate "explicit" flags for author and committer Jeff King
2012-11-28 18:26 ` [PATCH 5/5] t: add tests for "git var" Jeff King
2012-11-28 18:42 ` [PATCH 6/5] t9001: check send-email behavior with implicit sender Jeff King
2012-11-28 18:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-11-28 20:06 ` Jeff King
2012-11-28 20:17 ` Jeff King [this message]
2012-11-28 20:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-11-28 21:37 ` [PATCH 0/5] jk/send-email-sender-prompt loose ends Felipe Contreras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121128201713.GA9249@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).