git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Max Horn <max@quendi.de>, Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix some clang warnings
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:24:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130117102427.GC4574@serenity.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130116190137.GD2476@farnsworth.metanate.com>

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 07:01:37PM +0000, John Keeping wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:24:49AM -0800, Jeff King wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 06:22:40PM +0000, John Keeping wrote:
> > 
> > Thanks for checking. I'd rather squelch the warning completely (as in my
> > re-post of Max's patch from a few minutes ago), and we can loosen it
> > (possibly with a version check) later when a fix is widely disseminated.
> 
> I checked again with a trunk build of clang and the warning's still
> there, so I've created a clang bug [1] to see if they will change the
> behaviour.
> 
> [1] http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14968

Well, that was quick!  This warning is now gone when using a fresh trunk
build of clang.

>From [2], it looks like this will become version 3.3 (in about 5
months).  So should we change the condition to:

#if defined(__GNUC__) && (!defined(__clang__) ||
	__clang_major__ > 3 || \
        (__clang__major == 3 && __clang_minor__ >= 3)


[2] http://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html


John

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-17 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-16 14:53 [PATCH] fix some clang warnings Max Horn
2013-01-16 16:04 ` Jeff King
2013-01-16 16:53   ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-16 17:12     ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-16 17:18       ` John Keeping
2013-01-16 17:26         ` Max Horn
2013-01-16 17:50           ` Jeff King
2013-01-16 18:00             ` Jeff King
2013-01-16 18:09               ` Jeff King
2013-01-16 18:12               ` John Keeping
2013-01-16 18:15                 ` Jeff King
2013-01-16 18:21                   ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-16 18:22                   ` John Keeping
2013-01-16 18:24                     ` Jeff King
2013-01-16 19:01                       ` John Keeping
2013-01-17 10:24                         ` John Keeping [this message]
2013-01-16 22:47                       ` [PATCH 1/2] fix clang -Wconstant-conversion with bit fields Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-16 22:47                         ` [PATCH 2/2] fix clang -Wtautological-compare with unsigned enum Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-16 23:10                           ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-17 10:32                           ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-17 11:00                             ` John Keeping
2013-01-17 11:23                               ` [PATCH] combine-diff: suppress a clang warning John Keeping
2013-01-17 16:44                               ` [PATCH 2/2] fix clang -Wtautological-compare with unsigned enum Linus Torvalds
2013-01-17 16:56                                 ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-17 17:02                                 ` John Keeping
2013-01-18 17:15                                 ` Phil Hord
2013-01-18 18:52                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2013-01-16 23:08                         ` [PATCH 1/2] fix clang -Wconstant-conversion with bit fields John Keeping
2013-01-16 23:09                           ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-16 23:15                             ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-16 23:43                         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-16 23:46                           ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-16 18:03             ` [PATCH] fix some clang warnings Tomas Carnecky
2013-01-16 18:12             ` Matthieu Moy
2013-02-01  5:37             ` Miles Bader

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130117102427.GC4574@serenity.lan \
    --to=john@keeping.me.uk \
    --cc=apelisse@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
    --cc=max@quendi.de \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).