From: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
To: Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com>
Cc: Max Horn <max@quendi.de>, git <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fix clang -Wtautological-compare with unsigned enum
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:00:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130117110008.GD4574@serenity.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALWbr2wk+78zxGKCo-hCOwMuMOzdGspYvMu7PA6o0OYM3Y3m4A@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:32:39AM +0100, Antoine Pelisse wrote:
> John, could you confirm that you trigger the -Wtautological-compare
> warning with your version of clang ?
Yes, the warning is still there with both 3.2 and a recent trunk build
but this patch squelches it.
> And that this patch makes clang compilation warning-free (with the
> very latest clang) ?
There is one remaining warning on pu which hasn't been discussed in this
thread as far as I can see. I'll send a patch shortly.
There's also a warning that triggers with clang 3.2 but not clang trunk, which
I think is a legitimate warning - perhaps someone who understands integer type
promotion better than me can explain why the code is OK (patch->score is
declared as 'int'):
builtin/apply.c:1044:47: warning: comparison of constant 18446744073709551615
with expression of type 'int' is always false
[-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
if ((patch->score = strtoul(line, NULL, 10)) == ULONG_MAX)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Create a GREP_HEADER_FIELD_MIN so we can check that the field value is
> > sane and silent the clang warning.
> >
> > Clang warning happens because the enum is unsigned (this is
> > implementation-defined, and there is no negative fields) and the check
> > is then tautological.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > I tried to consider discussion [1] and this [2] discussion on clang's list
> >
> > With these two patches and the patch from Max Horne, I'm finally able to
> > compile with CC=clang CFLAGS=-Werror.
> >
> > [1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/184908
> > [2]: http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/Possibly-invalid-enum-tautology-warning-td3233140.html
> >
> > grep.c | 3 ++-
> > grep.h | 3 ++-
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/grep.c b/grep.c
> > index 4bd1b8b..bb548ca 100644
> > --- a/grep.c
> > +++ b/grep.c
> > @@ -625,7 +625,8 @@ static struct grep_expr *prep_header_patterns(struct grep_opt *opt)
> > for (p = opt->header_list; p; p = p->next) {
> > if (p->token != GREP_PATTERN_HEAD)
> > die("bug: a non-header pattern in grep header list.");
> > - if (p->field < 0 || GREP_HEADER_FIELD_MAX <= p->field)
> > + if (p->field < GREP_HEADER_FIELD_MIN ||
> > + GREP_HEADER_FIELD_MAX <= p->field)
> > die("bug: unknown header field %d", p->field);
> > compile_regexp(p, opt);
> > }
> > diff --git a/grep.h b/grep.h
> > index 8fc854f..e4a1df5 100644
> > --- a/grep.h
> > +++ b/grep.h
> > @@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ enum grep_context {
> > };
> >
> > enum grep_header_field {
> > - GREP_HEADER_AUTHOR = 0,
> > + GREP_HEADER_FIELD_MIN = 0,
> > + GREP_HEADER_AUTHOR = GREP_HEADER_FIELD_MIN,
> > GREP_HEADER_COMMITTER,
> > GREP_HEADER_REFLOG,
> >
> > --
> > 1.8.1.1.435.g20d29be.dirty
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-17 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-16 14:53 [PATCH] fix some clang warnings Max Horn
2013-01-16 16:04 ` Jeff King
2013-01-16 16:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-16 17:12 ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-16 17:18 ` John Keeping
2013-01-16 17:26 ` Max Horn
2013-01-16 17:50 ` Jeff King
2013-01-16 18:00 ` Jeff King
2013-01-16 18:09 ` Jeff King
2013-01-16 18:12 ` John Keeping
2013-01-16 18:15 ` Jeff King
2013-01-16 18:21 ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-16 18:22 ` John Keeping
2013-01-16 18:24 ` Jeff King
2013-01-16 19:01 ` John Keeping
2013-01-17 10:24 ` John Keeping
2013-01-16 22:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] fix clang -Wconstant-conversion with bit fields Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-16 22:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] fix clang -Wtautological-compare with unsigned enum Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-16 23:10 ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-17 10:32 ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-17 11:00 ` John Keeping [this message]
2013-01-17 11:23 ` [PATCH] combine-diff: suppress a clang warning John Keeping
2013-01-17 16:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] fix clang -Wtautological-compare with unsigned enum Linus Torvalds
2013-01-17 16:56 ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-17 17:02 ` John Keeping
2013-01-18 17:15 ` Phil Hord
2013-01-18 18:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-01-16 23:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] fix clang -Wconstant-conversion with bit fields John Keeping
2013-01-16 23:09 ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-16 23:15 ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-16 23:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-16 23:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-16 18:03 ` [PATCH] fix some clang warnings Tomas Carnecky
2013-01-16 18:12 ` Matthieu Moy
2013-02-01 5:37 ` Miles Bader
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130117110008.GD4574@serenity.lan \
--to=john@keeping.me.uk \
--cc=apelisse@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=max@quendi.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).