git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
To: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] mergetool--lib: Add functions for finding available tools
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:02:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130129230238.GF1342@serenity.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJDDKr4e=pg=YJ4CfUk7guUCcikBtXTveVX9j6CV5NtGvPB=9Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 02:27:21PM -0800, David Aguilar wrote:
> I don't want to stomp on your feet and poke at this file too much if
> you're planning on building on top of it (I already did a few times
> ;-).  My git time is a bit limited for the next few days so I don't
> want to hold you up.  I can help shepherd through small fixups that
> come up until the weekend rolls around and I have more time, but I
> also don't want to hold you back until then.
> 
> I will have some time tonight.  If you guys would prefer an
> incremental patch I can send one that changes the "ls" expression and
> the way the unavailable block is structured.  Otherwise, I can send
> replacements to handle the "test -z" thing, $TAB$TAB, and the
> simplification of the unavailable block.
> 
> Later patches (that are working towards the new feature) can
> generalize show_tool_names() further and eliminate the need for the
> available/unavailable variables altogether.  John, I would imagine
> that you'd want to pick that up since you're driving towards having
> --tool-help honor custom tools.
> 
> What do you think?

I was planning to hold off until this series is in a reasonable state -
there's no rush as far as I'm concerned, but if Junio's happy to leave
these patches with just the small fixups I'm happy to build on that with
a patch that removes the available and unavailable variables before
adding the tools from git-config.


John

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-29 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-28  0:52 [PATCH v2 0/4] Auto-generate mergetool lists David Aguilar
2013-01-28  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mergetool--lib: Simplify command expressions David Aguilar
2013-01-28  0:52   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mergetool--lib: Improve the help text in guess_merge_tool() David Aguilar
2013-01-28  0:52     ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mergetool--lib: Add functions for finding available tools David Aguilar
2013-01-28  0:52       ` [PATCH v2 4/4] doc: Generate a list of valid merge tools David Aguilar
2013-01-28  2:14         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-28 19:37       ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mergetool--lib: Add functions for finding available tools John Keeping
2013-01-28 20:36         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-29 19:48       ` John Keeping
2013-01-29 20:22         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-29 22:27           ` David Aguilar
2013-01-29 22:55             ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-29 23:06               ` John Keeping
2013-01-30  3:08                 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-30  3:34                   ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-29 23:02             ` John Keeping [this message]
2013-01-29 19:22   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mergetool--lib: Simplify command expressions John Keeping
2013-01-29 22:09     ` David Aguilar
2013-01-29 22:27       ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-30  6:20         ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mergetool--lib: simplify " David Aguilar
2013-01-30  7:04           ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-28  2:08 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Auto-generate mergetool lists Junio C Hamano
2013-01-28  2:21   ` David Aguilar
2013-01-28  2:27     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-28  2:41       ` David Aguilar
2013-01-28  2:53         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-28 21:01         ` John Keeping
2013-01-28 21:50           ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-28 22:21             ` John Keeping
2013-01-29 11:56               ` Joachim Schmitz
2013-01-29 12:09                 ` John Keeping
2013-01-29 16:15                   ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-29 16:46                     ` John Keeping
2013-01-28  8:20 ` Philip Oakley
2013-01-28  9:16   ` David Aguilar
2013-01-28 21:19     ` Philip Oakley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130129230238.GF1342@serenity.lan \
    --to=john@keeping.me.uk \
    --cc=davvid@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).