From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 03/10] pkt-line: clean up "gentle" reading function Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 05:25:51 -0500 Message-ID: <20130218102551.GN5096@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20130218091203.GB17003@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130218091619.GC5096@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130218101209.GC7049@elie.Belkin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Shawn O. Pearce" To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 18 11:26:37 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U7Nvg-0001Jt-MI for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:26:36 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757723Ab3BRK0M (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 05:26:12 -0500 Received: from 75-15-5-89.uvs.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([75.15.5.89]:51777 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757302Ab3BRKZy (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 05:25:54 -0500 Received: (qmail 18426 invoked by uid 107); 18 Feb 2013 10:27:25 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 05:27:25 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 05:25:51 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130218101209.GC7049@elie.Belkin> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 02:12:09AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Jeff King wrote: > > > Originally we had a single function for reading packetized > > data: packet_read_line. Commit 46284dd grew a more "gentle" > > form that would return an error instead of dying upon > > reading a truncated input stream. However: > > In other words: Hmph. I had originally written a commit message organized more like yours, then I changed it to try to be more clear. I guess that didn't work. But yes, you get the intent exactly. -Peff