From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Epler Subject: Re: Load testing of git Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:54:28 -0600 Message-ID: <20130224175427.GA4691@unpythonic.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Yuri Mikhailov X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 24 18:54:58 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U9fmq-0000Pa-HT for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 18:54:56 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758486Ab3BXRyc (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2013 12:54:32 -0500 Received: from dsl.unpythonic.net ([206.222.212.217]:43583 "EHLO unpythonic.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758025Ab3BXRyb (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2013 12:54:31 -0500 Received: by unpythonic.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 737BE114579; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:54:28 -0600 (CST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: In 2012 there was a thread about git's performance on large repositories. One archive of the discussion begins here: http://mid.gmane.org/CB5074CF.3AD7A%25joshua.redstone%40fb.com > The test repo has 4 million commits, linear history and about 1.3 > million files. I'm not sure to what extent git performance may have changed since then, e.g., by improving the index format. Jeff