From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: feature suggestion: improve rerere
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:42:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130306144225.GB15375@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51374382.6050101@viscovery.net>
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 02:24:18PM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 3/6/2013 11:16, schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
> > ++<<<<<<< ours
> > +ssize_t xread(int fd, void *buf, size_t count)
> > +{
> > + ssize_t ret, done = 0;
> > +
> > +retry:
> > + ret = read(fd, buf + done, count - done);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + done += ret;
> > +
> > + if (ret == 0 /* EOF */ || done == count)
> > + return done;
> > + else
> > + goto retry;
> > +}
> > +
> > ++||||||| base
> > ++=======
> > + #include "common.h"
> > +
> > ++>>>>>>> theirs
> > int main(int argc,char *argv[])
> > {
> > int fd, val, ret, size, wrote, len;
> >
> > This is the same conflict as the first one, just with ours and theirs
> > exchanged. So my suggestion is to make rerere use the resolution
> > recorded for the first conflict here.
> >
> > Sounds sensible?
>
> Of course, and rerere already does it. But only when you use git's default
> conflict markers rather than diff3 style markers that have this extra
> ||||| line.
I only did git checkout --conflict=diff3 after the merge conflict
happend. So I cannot confirm that git already does it.
So here is a reproduction receipe:
git clone git://git.infradead.org/mtd-utils.git
cd mtd-utils
git checkout ca39eb1
wget -O patch1 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.mtd/45779/raw
wget -O patch2 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.mtd/45591/raw
for p in patch1 patch2; do perl -p -i -e 'print "From tralala Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001\n" if $. == 1' $p; done
git am patch1
git am -3 patch2 # first merge conflict
perl -n -i -e 's/=======//; print unless /^[<>]{7} /;' flash_otp_write.c # resolve
git add flash_otp_write.c
git am --resolved
git rebase -i ca39eb1 # swap order of the two patches
results in
$ git ls-files -u
100644 f360a3e025deaf7acfb7b20c9fad90f498ae4430 1 flash_otp_write.c
100644 d407ebbf400e630dc00ee004ecb44be8af51b25d 2 flash_otp_write.c
100644 31b963e2d6cf0016ca542529886e1ee71a22664e 3 flash_otp_write.c
and resolving yields:
$ git ls-files -s flash_otp_write.c
100644 648e0422d21c0ffa7621f82b86c02a065e488293 0 flash_otp_write.c
Then
git rebase --continue
gives the 2nd rebase conflict:
$ git ls-files -u
100644 d407ebbf400e630dc00ee004ecb44be8af51b25d 1 flash_otp_write.c
100644 648e0422d21c0ffa7621f82b86c02a065e488293 2 flash_otp_write.c
100644 f360a3e025deaf7acfb7b20c9fad90f498ae4430 3 flash_otp_write.c
Now knowing from the previous resolution that with base=f360a3e0
(= origin + patch1) merging
d407ebbf (= origin) and
31b963e2 (= origin + patch1 + patch2)
gives 648e0422 (origin + patch2),
git could know that with base=d407ebbf (origin) merging 648e0422 (origin
+ patch1) and f360a3e0 (origin + patch1) gives 31b963e2 (origin + patch1
+ patch2) again.
And git doesn't prepare 31b963e2 in flash_otp_write.c for me.
@Johannes, do you have some non-standard setting, or can you reproduce?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-06 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-06 10:16 feature suggestion: improve rerere Uwe Kleine-König
2013-03-06 13:24 ` Johannes Sixt
2013-03-06 14:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2013-03-07 7:05 ` Johannes Sixt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130306144225.GB15375@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).