From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] config: make parsing stack struct independent from actual data source Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:03:55 -0400 Message-ID: <20130312110355.GE11340@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20130310165642.GA1136@sandbox-ub.fritz.box> <20130310165940.GD1136@sandbox-ub.fritz.box> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Jens Lehmann , Ramsay Jones To: Heiko Voigt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 12 12:04:43 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UFN0d-0000Nh-01 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:04:43 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755353Ab3CLLEP (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:04:15 -0400 Received: from 75-15-5-89.uvs.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([75.15.5.89]:49559 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754512Ab3CLLD6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:03:58 -0400 Received: (qmail 25960 invoked by uid 107); 12 Mar 2013 11:05:38 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:05:38 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:03:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130310165940.GD1136@sandbox-ub.fritz.box> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 05:59:40PM +0100, Heiko Voigt wrote: > diff --git a/config.c b/config.c > index f55c43d..fe1c0e5 100644 > --- a/config.c > +++ b/config.c > @@ -10,20 +10,42 @@ > #include "strbuf.h" > #include "quote.h" > > -typedef struct config_file { > - struct config_file *prev; > - FILE *f; > +struct config_source { > + struct config_source *prev; > + void *data; Would a union be more appropriate here? We do not ever have to pass it directly as a parameter, since we pass the "struct config_source" to the method functions. It's still possible to screw up using a union, but it's slightly harder than screwing up using a void pointer. And I do not think we need the run-time flexibility offered by the void pointer in this case. > +static int config_file_fgetc(struct config_source *conf) > +{ > + FILE *f = conf->data; > + return fgetc(f); > +} This could become just: return fgetc(conf->u.f); and so forth (might it make sense to give "f" a more descriptive name, as we are adding other sources?). -Peff