From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] peel-ref optimization fixes Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 04:21:39 -0400 Message-ID: <20130317082139.GA29505@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20130316090018.GA26708@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Michael Haggerty To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Mar 17 09:22:23 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UH8rG-0007yi-MT for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 09:22:23 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756038Ab3CQIVp (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Mar 2013 04:21:45 -0400 Received: from 75-15-5-89.uvs.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([75.15.5.89]:54161 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756028Ab3CQIVl (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Mar 2013 04:21:41 -0400 Received: (qmail 7680 invoked by uid 107); 17 Mar 2013 08:23:23 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 04:23:23 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 17 Mar 2013 04:21:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130316090018.GA26708@sigill.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Here's a re-roll that takes into account the feedback from round 1: [1/4]: avoid segfaults on parse_object failure [2/4]: use parse_object_or_die instead of die("bad object") These two patches are new; they are conceptually independent of the rest of the series, but there's a textual dependency in later patches. [3/4]: pack-refs: write peeled entry for non-tags Same as before, but rebased on patch 1, and s/``/$()/. [4/4]: pack-refs: add fully-peeled trait Rewritten using Michael's approach, which is more readable. -Peff