From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Support triangular workflows Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:32:51 -0400 Message-ID: <20130318143251.GC23075@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1363612575-7340-1-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com> <20130318142526.GA23075@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Git List , Junio C Hamano To: Ramkumar Ramachandra X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 18 15:33:32 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UHb7q-00068T-SV for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:33:23 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751874Ab3CROc4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:32:56 -0400 Received: from 75-15-5-89.uvs.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([75.15.5.89]:56111 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751419Ab3CROcz (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:32:55 -0400 Received: (qmail 17780 invoked by uid 107); 18 Mar 2013 14:34:38 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:34:38 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:32:51 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 07:58:23PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > Jeff King wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 06:46:11PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > >> Documentation/config.txt | 23 ++++++++++++++++--- > >> builtin/push.c | 2 +- > >> remote.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > >> remote.h | 1 + > >> 4 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > > > No new tests? > > Honestly, it slipped my mind. Will write it now. > > Thanks for the reminder. Thanks. Other than the suggestion I made on 2/4, I do not see anything wrong with the series. -Peff