From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: USE_NSEC bug? Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:00:53 -0400 Message-ID: <20130320190053.GC30165@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20130320075344.GA8159@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vppyuf1f5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20130320170957.GA21350@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7v620mf05l.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20130320183049.GB29609@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vobedewer.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Andrew Rodland , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 20 20:01:28 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UIOGN-0005f0-TF for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:01:28 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753439Ab3CTTBA (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:01:00 -0400 Received: from 75-15-5-89.uvs.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([75.15.5.89]:60408 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751120Ab3CTTA7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:00:59 -0400 Received: (qmail 11505 invoked by uid 107); 20 Mar 2013 19:02:43 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:02:43 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:00:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vobedewer.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:52:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King writes: > > > So I think your real complaint is "configure does not set NO_NSEC > > properly", which is something worth fixing. > > Yes. > > I think our "Meh" was about "do we want to unify USE_NSEC and > NO_NSEC?" and nothing else. Exactly. Now I am hoping Andrew will volunteer to fix configure.ac, as I will be happy to go to my grave never having had to figure out autoconf m4 syntax ever again. :) -Peff