From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] branch: improve error message for missing --set-upstream-to ref
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 15:04:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130402190427.GC32316@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130402190134.GA17784@sigill.intra.peff.net>
If we are trying to set the upstream config for a branch,
the create_branch function will check both that the name
resolves as a ref, and that it is either a local or
remote-tracking branch.
However, before we do so we run get_sha1 on it to find out
whether it resolves at all (since the create_branch function
is also used to create actual branches, it wants to know
where to start the new branch). This means that if you feed
a ref that does not exist to "branch --set-upstream-to",
rather than getting a helpful message about tracking, you
only get "not a valid object name".
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
---
branch.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/branch.c b/branch.c
index 1acbd4e..060e9e3 100644
--- a/branch.c
+++ b/branch.c
@@ -199,6 +199,8 @@ N_("Cannot setup tracking information; starting point is not a branch.");
static const char upstream_not_branch[] =
N_("Cannot setup tracking information; starting point is not a branch.");
+static const char upstream_missing[] =
+N_("Cannot setup tracking information; starting point does not exist");
void create_branch(const char *head,
const char *name, const char *start_name,
@@ -227,8 +229,11 @@ void create_branch(const char *head,
}
real_ref = NULL;
- if (get_sha1(start_name, sha1))
+ if (get_sha1(start_name, sha1)) {
+ if (explicit_tracking)
+ die(_(upstream_missing));
die("Not a valid object name: '%s'.", start_name);
+ }
switch (dwim_ref(start_name, strlen(start_name), sha1, &real_ref)) {
case 0:
--
1.8.2.rc0.33.gd915649
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-02 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-02 17:07 [BUG] inconsistent behavior with --set-upstream vs --set-upstream-to Garrett Cooper
2013-04-02 17:23 ` Jeff King
2013-04-02 17:30 ` Garrett Cooper
2013-04-02 17:51 ` Jeff King
2013-04-02 19:01 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/5] branch --set-upstream-to error-message improvements Jeff King
2013-04-02 19:02 ` [PATCH 1/5] t3200: test --set-upstream-to with bogus refs Jeff King
2013-04-02 19:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] branch: factor out "upstream is not a branch" error messages Jeff King
2013-04-02 19:36 ` Garrett Cooper
2013-04-02 19:36 ` Garrett Cooper
2013-04-02 19:04 ` Jeff King [this message]
2013-04-02 19:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] branch: mention start_name in set-upstream " Jeff King
2013-04-02 19:39 ` Garrett Cooper
2013-04-02 19:05 ` [PATCH 5/5] branch: give advice when tracking start-point is missing Jeff King
2013-04-02 21:50 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/5] branch --set-upstream-to error-message improvements Junio C Hamano
2013-04-02 19:08 ` [BUG] inconsistent behavior with --set-upstream vs --set-upstream-to Jonathan Nieder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130402190427.GC32316@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yaneurabeya@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).