From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Ramkumar Ramachandra" <artagnon@gmail.com>,
"Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>, "Git List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Duy Nguyễn" <pclouds@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ITCH] Specify refspec without remote
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:13:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130409231332.GZ30308@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vhajfqz8r.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> And I think now I agree that indeed is a sensible assumption. I am
> not sure '-' is a good token for that, but I do not offhand think of
> a reason why '-' would be a _bad_ token for that, either.
Random idea: today you can do
git push origin master; # push branch master to remote origin
git push --multiple origin korg; # push default refspec to 2 remotes
How about:
git push origin korg -- master; # push master to 2 remotes
git push -- master next; # push two refs to default remote
git push origin -- master; # push master to origin, more explicitly
git push origin korg --; # push default refspec to 2 remotes, again
git push host:some/path; # ambiguous argument. Please disambiguate.
git push host:some/path --; # push default refspec over SSH
git push -- host:some/path; # push specified refspec to default remote
git push origin; # is a remote name and not a refname. Good.
git push master; # is a ref name and not a remote name. Good.
What do you think?
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-09 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-18 16:58 [ITCH] Specify refspec without remote Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-03-18 17:08 ` Jeff King
2013-03-19 9:58 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-03-19 10:02 ` Jeff King
2013-03-19 11:33 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-03-19 11:53 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-03-19 12:15 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-03-19 13:03 ` Holger Hellmuth (IKS)
2013-03-19 11:58 ` Holger Hellmuth (IKS)
2013-03-19 15:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-03-19 15:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-09 11:44 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-09 17:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-09 17:39 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-09 17:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-09 18:03 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-09 18:08 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-09 19:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-09 23:13 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2013-04-09 23:14 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-04-10 1:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-10 4:13 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 16:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-10 17:27 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 18:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-10 18:59 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 19:31 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 19:33 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 19:52 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 20:05 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 20:21 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 20:41 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 21:02 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 21:32 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 20:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-10 19:53 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 20:05 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-04-10 20:11 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 21:23 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-04-10 20:05 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 20:19 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 20:24 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 20:55 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 21:04 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 21:11 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 21:18 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-04-10 21:23 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 21:29 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-04-10 21:42 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 21:56 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 22:06 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 22:16 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 22:11 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 22:23 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 22:31 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-11 7:38 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-11 7:45 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-11 21:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-13 5:07 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 20:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-10 21:15 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-12 22:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-10 3:50 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 13:22 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-10 15:56 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 16:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-10 17:29 ` Jeff King
2013-04-10 13:19 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130409231332.GZ30308@google.com \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).