From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [ITCH] Specify refspec without remote Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:56:58 -0400 Message-ID: <20130410215658.GC6215@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20130410200548.GC24177@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130410202456.GF24177@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130410210455.GA2999@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130410211824.GC27070@google.com> <20130410212911.GE27070@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Jonathan Nieder , Junio C Hamano , Git List , Duy =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4=?= To: Ramkumar Ramachandra X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 10 23:57:13 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UQ30y-0006z3-Bi for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:57:12 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934913Ab3DJV5H (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:57:07 -0400 Received: from 75-15-5-89.uvs.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([75.15.5.89]:39323 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755680Ab3DJV5G (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:57:06 -0400 Received: (qmail 8431 invoked by uid 107); 10 Apr 2013 21:58:58 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:58:58 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:56:58 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 03:12:20AM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > My first hunch is not to like this, since it means > > > > git push -- master next > > > > might push to two different remotes and because it's not obvious > > to me when it would be useful. > > Yes, it will push to two different remotes. And why is it not useful? It's not that it's not potentially useful. It's that it may be surprising and annoying to users who did not want that. -Peff