From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: [QUERY] Why do we have git-completion.zsh? Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 11:53:29 -0700 Message-ID: <20130420185329.GB8586@elie.Belkin> References: <20130420184539.GA8586@elie.Belkin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git List , Felipe Contreras , Junio C Hamano To: Ramkumar Ramachandra X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Apr 20 20:53:43 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UTcut-0003Ao-2d for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 20:53:43 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751359Ab3DTSxi (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:53:38 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174]:40858 "EHLO mail-pd0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750992Ab3DTSxh (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:53:37 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id p12so2823337pdj.19 for ; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 11:53:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=RijoC9pCd764hPYW27DF3vNSzrFpU/CoVr72YDvHUrc=; b=zf3UjoygzaVd4Jqe4Lquvahm7M8UuJAxcRRa50wX1p6t/KudmT7UOzJeNm6V11TnRi 8DHvfeEuyESjpCYZ/AZG+ZamL97bDi/7M+uKBeE00mslw+XNWraSS5rTSg+X8bdBODmf I8r7ufSjKV/atffgOhvabcB4f0DBT8er9Jj7K2RKhSZ6UYg44FxtzdsLuUx+Y3bjxCUx nGixQJZWtKLE+ekd9kUV/vwMfkUtTMmSRIamjcKh7BUi61JugClo0Mdo/WP1e4W+4uS1 fzEhbAUzQsz1dqgNeGMZE7D5liv0lHli3S9bk8yU/x3KqdKukJgIyKsz6BGzay7904+T Arew== X-Received: by 10.66.89.199 with SMTP id bq7mr8518926pab.202.1366484017136; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 11:53:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elie.Belkin (c-107-3-135-164.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [107.3.135.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fq1sm18118847pbb.33.2013.04.20.11.53.35 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 20 Apr 2013 11:53:36 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130420184539.GA8586@elie.Belkin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21+51 (9e756d1adb76) (2011-07-01) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: >> However, I don't understand why we >> maintain it, because there's a comprehensive first-class completer in >> ZSH core [1] which I use all the time. Shouldn't the completion folks >> be contributing to this instead? > > Only if they want to. [...] > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/210022/focus=210024 Sorry, wrong link. Here's a better one: http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers/2011/msg00497.html More fundamentally, your question seems to assume some kind of shared plan regarding what people work on, rather than each person choosing to work on what they consider valuable without having to justify it to others. I am very happy with Felipe's work on git's completion code and don't think it does any harm to efforts elsewhere. Thanks for your interest, Jonathan