From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Cc: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>,
Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: log --cherry and merges (was [RFC/PATCH 0/2] merge-base: add --merge-child option)
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 23:43:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130520064343.GC2919@elie.Belkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130519124059.GJ27005@serenity.lan>
John Keeping wrote:
> The following patch makes the revision cherry machinery ignore merges
> unconditionally. With it applied, there's not noticeable difference in
> speed between "git cherry" and "git log --cherry".
>
> -- >8 --
> diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
> index a67b615..19d0683 100644
> --- a/revision.c
> +++ b/revision.c
> @@ -640,6 +640,11 @@ static void cherry_pick_list(struct commit_list *list, struct rev_info *revs)
>
> if (flags & BOUNDARY)
> continue;
> +
> + /* Patch ID is meaningless for merges. */
> + if (commit->parents && commit->parents->next)
> + continue;
> +
I guess merges should be skipped in the left-vs-right tally earlier,
too?
if (flags & BOUNDARY)
;
else if (commit->parents && commit->parents->next)
;
else if (flags & SYMMETRIC_LEFT)
left_count++;
else
right_count++;
With that tweak (or without it --- a sloppy count is fine), this
patch makes sense to me. I guess some tests would be useful to
demonstrate that --cherry doesn't notice duplicate first-parent
diffs in merges.
Thanks,
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-20 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-11 12:23 [RFC/PATCH 0/2] merge-base: add --merge-child option John Keeping
2013-05-11 12:23 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/2] commit: add commit_list_contains function John Keeping
2013-05-11 12:23 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/2] merge-base: add --merge-child option John Keeping
2013-05-11 17:54 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/2] " Junio C Hamano
2013-05-11 18:48 ` John Keeping
2013-05-12 15:44 ` Kevin Bracey
2013-05-12 16:28 ` John Keeping
2013-05-12 16:33 ` John Keeping
2013-05-12 17:14 ` Kevin Bracey
2013-05-12 22:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-05-13 14:26 ` Kevin Bracey
2013-05-13 14:45 ` Michael J Gruber
2013-05-19 12:40 ` log --cherry and merges (was [RFC/PATCH 0/2] merge-base: add --merge-child option) John Keeping
2013-05-20 6:43 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2013-05-13 15:00 ` [PATCH 0/2] Make --ancestry-path A...B work Kevin Bracey
2013-05-13 15:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] t6019: demonstrate --ancestry-path A...B breakage Kevin Bracey
2013-05-13 15:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] revision.c: treat A...B merge bases as if manually specified Kevin Bracey
2013-05-13 16:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-05-12 16:58 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/2] merge-base: add --merge-child option John Keeping
2013-05-12 17:29 ` Kevin Bracey
2013-05-13 5:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-05-13 7:52 ` John Keeping
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130520064343.GC2919@elie.Belkin \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@drmicha.warpmail.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=john@keeping.me.uk \
--cc=kevin@bracey.fi \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).