From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: push not resolving commit-ish? Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 00:09:20 +0300 Message-ID: <20130523210920.GB31421@redhat.com> References: <20130523105310.GA17361@redhat.com> <7v8v35fu7n.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 23 23:13:24 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ufcp6-0007VY-C3 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 23:13:20 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758979Ab3EWVNQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 May 2013 17:13:16 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:21410 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758619Ab3EWVNQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 May 2013 17:13:16 -0400 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4NL8vgv016629 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 23 May 2013 17:08:57 -0400 Received: from redhat.com (vpn-202-161.tlv.redhat.com [10.35.202.161]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id r4NL8twp008950; Thu, 23 May 2013 17:08:56 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7v8v35fu7n.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.11 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:05:00AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > > > Looks like push can't resolve tags to commits. > > Why is that? > > How else would you push a tag out? Well my reaction is, it seems to figure out it needs a commit and then instead of just getting it, it errors out. Why not just DWIM? But at least I see the reason now, thanks. -- MST