From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fetch: don't try to update unfetched tracking refs Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 12:35:00 -0400 Message-ID: <20130527163500.GA18405@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <9c6fd36368cd6b0fba4855be4d31106781c02f58.1369654825.git.john@keeping.me.uk> <20130527154252.GB8250@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130527160129.GN27005@serenity.lan> <20130527161934.GB9235@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130527163308.GO27005@serenity.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: John Keeping X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 27 18:35:13 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uh0O7-0005H3-6d for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 27 May 2013 18:35:11 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754193Ab3E0QfF (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 May 2013 12:35:05 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:45041 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752566Ab3E0QfE (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 May 2013 12:35:04 -0400 Received: (qmail 1053 invoked by uid 102); 27 May 2013 16:35:41 -0000 Received: from c-71-62-74-146.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.62.74.146) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Mon, 27 May 2013 11:35:41 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 27 May 2013 12:35:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130527163308.GO27005@serenity.lan> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 05:33:09PM +0100, John Keeping wrote: > > Ah, I see. It is not "the refspec on the command-line does not match a > > configured refspec", but rather "there exists a configured non-pattern > > refspec that does not match what was on the command-line (even if what > > was on the command-line did match another refspec)". > > Exactly. I've changed the commit message to (hopefully) make this > clearer. It does. To me, anyway. :) Thanks again. -Peff