From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2013, #02; Tue, 4) Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 03:12:06 -0400 Message-ID: <20130605071206.GC14427@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <7vtxld30f2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <51AEE1C3.9020507@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jun 05 09:12:18 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uk7tH-0005JR-QW for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 09:12:16 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752121Ab3FEHML (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2013 03:12:11 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:48195 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751988Ab3FEHMK (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2013 03:12:10 -0400 Received: (qmail 5784 invoked by uid 102); 5 Jun 2013 07:12:56 -0000 Received: from c-71-62-74-146.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.62.74.146) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 02:12:56 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 05 Jun 2013 03:12:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51AEE1C3.9020507@viscovery.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 08:59:15AM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote: > Am 6/5/2013 1:45, schrieb Junio C Hamano: > > * jk/test-exit-code-by-signal (2013-06-02) 1 commit > > (merged to 'next' on 2013-06-03 at 25af892) > > + t0005: test git exit code from signal death > > > > Will merge to 'master'. > > I haven't gotten around to run this new test on Windows. I've reason to > believe that it won't pass as is. Please don't let it graduate, yet. Yeah, I sort of assumed that we would need to check for either "3" or "131" on Windows, but I wasn't sure which. I don't think there is any rush on it. -Peff