From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: David Jeske <davidj@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ephemeral-branches instead of detached-head?
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 00:39:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130812073942.GA18948@elie.Belkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+CP9O6on2NXo6o4_0NoULnT8sgUD3pvvkFZvCTM5xKb38qOeA@mail.gmail.com>
David Jeske wrote:
> Ephemeral branch names would be
> local-only and would never be pushed.
That's how normal branch names behave (local branch names and remote
branch names live in different namespaces). How would the proposed
detached HEAD replacement compare to them? Would the temporary branch
created by checking out a random commit be automatically deleted when
checking out another branch, or would it be garbage-collected at some
point later?
Curious,
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-12 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-12 7:25 ephemeral-branches instead of detached-head? David Jeske
2013-08-12 7:39 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2013-08-12 7:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-08-12 8:37 ` David Jeske
2013-08-12 12:14 ` David Jeske
2013-08-12 13:23 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-08-12 17:04 ` Andreas Schwab
2013-08-12 17:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-08-12 19:40 ` David Jeske
2013-08-12 19:05 ` David Jeske
2013-08-12 17:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-08-13 6:05 ` Duy Nguyen
[not found] ` <CA+CP9O5Ak3YD60--Mj+eLv3qzbZuuwTN-AxY3xb=SciKD=uZoQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-08-13 15:13 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-08-13 15:36 ` Fwd: " David Jeske
2013-08-13 16:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-08-13 17:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-08-13 16:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-08-14 0:04 ` Sitaram Chamarty
2013-08-14 1:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-08-14 6:32 ` Sitaram Chamarty
2013-08-14 6:59 ` Jeff King
2013-08-14 7:10 ` Andres Perera
2013-08-14 9:05 ` Sitaram Chamarty
2013-08-14 16:40 ` Andres Perera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130812073942.GA18948@elie.Belkin \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=davidj@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).