From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] check-ignore: Add option to ignore index contents Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 06:59:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20130906055955.GA12622@opensourcesolutions.co.uk> References: <20130905160801.GA22710@opensourcesolutions.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git List , Adam Spiers , Duy Nguyen , Eric Sunshine To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Sep 06 08:00:16 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VHp5Y-0006pN-56 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:00:12 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751046Ab3IFGAF (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Sep 2013 02:00:05 -0400 Received: from 46-65-59-139.zone16.bethere.co.uk ([46.65.59.139]:62550 "EHLO loganberry.opensourcesolutions.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751038Ab3IFGAE (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Sep 2013 02:00:04 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by loganberry.opensourcesolutions.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12360EEC189; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 07:00:02 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at loganberry.opensourcesolutions.co.uk Received: from loganberry.opensourcesolutions.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (loganberry.opensourcesolutions.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id vufl+xpJXs7v; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 06:59:55 +0100 (BST) Received: from tangerine (tangerine.opensourcesolutions.co.uk [192.168.149.59]) by loganberry.opensourcesolutions.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D78EEC0C4; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 06:59:55 +0100 (BST) Received: by tangerine (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8A7C4100449; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 06:59:55 +0100 (BST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 15:27, Thu 05 Sep 13, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Now the long option name is "--no-index", it makes me wonder if "-i" > is a good synonym for it, and the longer I stare at it, the more > certain I become convinced that it is a bad choice. > I had originally called it "--ignore-index" at which point "-i" made more sense! Dave