git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG?] git checkout $commit -- somedir doesn't drop files
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:29:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130917202917.GA20020@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq61tzxkgz.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 01:27:08PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:58:07PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> I could argue that the above intended behaviour is suboptimal and it
> >> should have been "the resulting paths in the index and the work tree
> >> that match the given pathspec must be identical to that of the
> >> tree-ish".  In the resulting index or working tree, paths that match
> >> "subdir" pathspec in the above result is subdir/a and subdir/b, and
> >> that is different from what exists in the given tree-ish (which has
> >> only subdir/a and not subdir/b), and under that modified definition,
> >> what the current one does is not correct.
> >
> > Our emails just crossed, but I basically ended up saying a similar
> > thing.  Could we simply replace the "update_some" in builtin/checkout.c
> > with a two-way merge via unpack-trees?
> 
> Would it work to resolve a conflicted index by checking out from a
> known tree?

Hrm. Probably not. It is almost a one-way merge going to the named tree
(but limited by the pathspec), except that I think the current
git-checkout code may provide some safety checks related to where we are
coming from (e.g., do we unconditionally overwrite entries that are not
uptodate?).

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-17 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-17 19:06 [BUG?] git checkout $commit -- somedir doesn't drop files Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-17 19:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-17 20:13   ` Jeff King
2013-09-17 20:27     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-17 20:29       ` Jeff King [this message]
2013-09-17 20:40         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-17 21:21           ` Jeff King
2013-09-17 22:00             ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-17 22:03               ` Jeff King
2013-09-17 22:14                 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-19  7:46                   ` Jeff King
2013-09-19 18:02                     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-19 22:13                       ` Jeff King
2013-09-20 22:54                         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-17 20:10 ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130917202917.GA20020@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).