From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RelNotes: Spelling & grammar fixes.
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:58:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131118195827.GI27781@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqmwl1blg7.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com> writes:
>> * "git branch -v -v" (and "git status") did not distinguish among a
>> - branch that does not build on any other branch, a branch that is in
>> - sync with the branch it builds on, and a branch that is configured
>> - to build on some other branch that no longer exists.
>> + branch that is not tracking any other branch, a branch that is in
>> + sync with the branch it is tracking, and a branch that is tracking
>> + some other branch that no longer exists.
>
> People use the verb "track" to mean too many different things, and
> the original deliberately tried to avoid use of that word.
>
> Specifically, we try to limit the use of "track" to mean "to keep a
> copy of what we observed from the remote" as in "remote-tracking
> branch remotes/origin/master is used to track the 'master' branch at
> your 'origin'", which is very different from "your 'master' branch
> builds on your upstream's 'master'".
How about something like the following, in the same spirit as --track
giving way to --set-upstream-to)?
* "git branch -v -v" and "git status" did not distinguish among a
branch that does not have a corresponding upstream branch, a
branch that is in sync with its upstream, and a branch whose
upstream no longer exists.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-18 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-13 23:07 [ANNOUNCE] Git v1.8.5-rc2 Junio C Hamano
2013-11-14 16:47 ` Marc Branchaud
2013-11-18 17:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-11-18 18:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-11-18 19:42 ` Marc Branchaud
2013-11-14 17:01 ` [PATCH] RelNotes: Spelling & grammar fixes Marc Branchaud
2013-11-15 15:26 ` Marc Branchaud
2013-11-18 18:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-11-18 19:52 ` Marc Branchaud
2013-11-18 20:00 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-11-18 22:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-11-18 19:58 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131118195827.GI27781@google.com \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=marcnarc@xiplink.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).