From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Voigt Subject: Re: Re: [RFC PATCH] disable complete ignorance of submodules for index <-> HEAD diff Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 08:10:01 +0100 Message-ID: <20131128071001.GA1057@book.hvoigt.net> References: <20131122151120.GA32361@sigill.intra.peff.net> <528FC638.5060403@web.de> <20131122215454.GA4952@sandbox-ub> <20131123011145.GB4952@sandbox-ub> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jens Lehmann , Ramkumar Ramachandra , Jeff King , Git List , Junio C Hamano To: Sergey Sharybin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Nov 28 08:10:18 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vlvjt-0001dU-SY for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 08:10:18 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751384Ab3K1HKN (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Nov 2013 02:10:13 -0500 Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de ([80.67.31.24]:40908 "EHLO smtprelay01.ispgateway.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751184Ab3K1HKM (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Nov 2013 02:10:12 -0500 Received: from [77.20.34.36] (helo=book.hvoigt.net) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Vlvjj-0007Nz-6a; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 08:10:07 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Df-Sender: aHZvaWd0QGh2b2lndC5uZXQ= Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 03:01:34PM +0600, Sergey Sharybin wrote: > Tested the patch. `git status` now shows the changes to the > submodules, which is nice :) > > However, is it possible to make it so `git commit` lists submodules in > "changes to be committed" section, so you'll see what's gonna to be in > the commit while typing the commit message as well? Yes, of course that should be shown. Will add in the next iteration. Which will hopefully be a much simpler implementation. Possibly getting rid of this new flag. Cheers Heiko