From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] prune_object_dir(): verify that path fits in the temporary buffer
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:00:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131218200043.GA10244@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa9fyhrzt.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:35:34AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> This function is called to remove
>
> * Any tmp_* found directly in .git/objects/
> * Any tmp_* found directly in .git/objects/pack/
> * Any tmp_obj_* found directly in .git/objects/??/
>
> and shares the same expiration logic with prune_object(). The only
> difference from the other function is what the file is called in
> dry-run or verbose report ("stale temporary file" vs "<sha-1> <typename>").
>
> We may want to rename it to prune_tmp_file(); its usage may have
> been limited to an unborn loose object file at some point in the
> history, but it does not look that way in today's code.
Yes, certainly the rename makes sense (and I think the history is as you
mentioned). I noticed the similarity between the two, as well. It might
be simple to refactor into a single function.
> > - prune_object(path, de->d_name, sha1);
> > + strbuf_addf(path, "/%s", de->d_name);
> > + prune_object(path->buf, sha1);
> > + path->len = baselen;
>
> This is minor, but I prefer using strbuf_setlen() for this.
Good catch. I do not think it is minor at all; my version is buggy.
After the loop ends, path->len does not match the NUL in path->buf. That
is OK if the next caller is strbuf-aware, but if it were to pass
path->buf straight to a system call, that would be rather...confusing.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-18 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-17 13:43 [PATCH 0/3] Fix two buffer overflows and remove a redundant var Michael Haggerty
2013-12-17 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] prune-packed: fix a possible buffer overflow Michael Haggerty
2013-12-17 13:57 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-12-17 18:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-12-18 22:44 ` Michael Haggerty
2013-12-19 0:04 ` Jeff King
2013-12-19 16:33 ` Michael Haggerty
2013-12-20 9:30 ` Jeff King
2013-12-19 0:37 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-12-17 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] prune_object_dir(): verify that path fits in the temporary buffer Michael Haggerty
2013-12-17 18:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-12-17 23:22 ` Jeff King
2013-12-18 19:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-12-18 20:00 ` Jeff King [this message]
2013-12-18 20:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-12-18 20:11 ` Jeff King
2013-12-18 20:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-12-18 20:27 ` Jeff King
2013-12-17 18:56 ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-12-17 13:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] cmd_repack(): remove redundant local variable "nr_packs" Michael Haggerty
2013-12-17 13:46 ` Stefan Beller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131218200043.GA10244@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).