From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Bernhard R. Link" Subject: Re: git:// protocol over SSL/TLS Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 17:26:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20131227162606.GA6973@client.brlink.eu> References: <20131227173655.3f3109e7ba848c90b302e2f9@domain007.com> <87mwjm4c3s.fsf@igel.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Matthieu Moy , Andreas Schwab , Konstantin Khomoutov , Git List To: Sergey Sharybin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Dec 27 18:16:14 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vwb19-0002oI-46 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 18:16:11 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753776Ab3L0RQF (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Dec 2013 12:16:05 -0500 Received: from server.brlink.eu ([78.46.187.186]:55410 "EHLO server.brlink.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751225Ab3L0RQE (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Dec 2013 12:16:04 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 1761 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 12:16:04 EST Received: from client.brlink.eu by server.brlink.eu with esmtpsa (tls-peer-hash KfHJgA) id 1VwaYW-0001B5-Nx; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 17:46:36 +0100 Received: with local; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 17:26:09 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: * Sergey Sharybin [131227 15:25]: > Security in this case is about being sure everyone gets exactly the > same repository as stored on the server, without any modifications to > the sources cased by MITM. Note that ssl (and thus https) only helps here against a resource-less man-in-the-middle. Getting catch-all CA-signed certificates is said to no longer available to everyone as easily as it was some years ago, but unless you allow only one private CA (and even there clients often fail) you still should assume everyone resourceful enough to still be able to do MITM. Bernhard R. Link