From: Konstantin Khomoutov <flatworm@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Sergey Sharybin <sergey.vfx@gmail.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khomoutov <flatworm@users.sourceforge.net>,
Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,
Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git:// protocol over SSL/TLS
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 18:56:57 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131227185657.0dee9b2062fe6c632cd7d3a4@domain007.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErtv25uWbsH15yohh+6Jun3eD51dZzvj7udoBf14_EwXzSUPg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 27 Dec 2013 20:47:54 +0600
Sergey Sharybin <sergey.vfx@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> > As discussed in an earlier thread here, a good indication of the
> > dumb version of the protocol being in use is no display of the
> > fetching progress on the client while doing `git clone` because this
> > information (like "compressing objects ..." etc) is sent by the
> > server-side Git process which is only there if HTTP[S] "was smart".
> > Otherwise the client just GETs packs of objects, traverses them,
> > GETs more and so on, so batches of HTTP GET requests correlating to
> > clone sessions in the web server logs should also be indicative of
> > the problem.
>
> Just to verify, if i see messages like "Receiving objects: 1%
> (7289/705777), 1.72 MiB | 340.00 KiB/s" it means server is "smart" ?
I would say yes, because your Git knows the precise number of objects to
receive. Unfortunately, I won't swear by this as this was a long time
ago I have seen cloning using the dumb protocol.
By the way, here [1] is that discussion.
1. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/238933/focus=238946
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-27 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-27 12:59 git:// protocol over SSL/TLS Sergey Sharybin
2013-12-27 13:29 ` Andreas Schwab
2013-12-27 13:36 ` Konstantin Khomoutov
2013-12-27 13:58 ` Sergey Sharybin
2013-12-27 14:12 ` Andreas Schwab
2013-12-27 14:16 ` Konstantin Khomoutov
2013-12-27 14:18 ` Sergey Sharybin
2013-12-27 14:20 ` Matthieu Moy
2013-12-27 14:25 ` Sergey Sharybin
2013-12-27 14:39 ` Konstantin Khomoutov
2013-12-27 14:47 ` Sergey Sharybin
2013-12-27 14:56 ` Konstantin Khomoutov [this message]
2013-12-28 9:37 ` Jeff King
2013-12-27 16:26 ` Bernhard R. Link
2013-12-28 20:52 ` Sergey Sharybin
2013-12-28 0:11 ` brian m. carlson
2013-12-27 14:29 ` Andreas Schwab
2013-12-27 14:21 ` Pyeron, Jason J CTR (US)
2013-12-27 14:14 ` Konstantin Khomoutov
2013-12-27 22:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-12-28 20:00 ` Ilari Liusvaara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131227185657.0dee9b2062fe6c632cd7d3a4@domain007.com \
--to=flatworm@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=sergey.vfx@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).