From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>, Thomas Rast <tr@thomasrast.ch>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] t0000: simplify HARNESS_ACTIVE hack
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 04:31:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131228093149.GB21109@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131228092731.GA26337@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Commit 517cd55 set HARNESS_ACTIVE unconditionally in
sub-tests, because that value affects the output of
"--verbose". t0000 needs stable output from its sub-tests,
and we may or may not be running under a TAP harness.
That commit made the decision to always set the variable,
since it has another useful side effect, which is
suppressing writes to t/test-results by the sub-tests (which
would just pollute the real results).
Since the last commit, though, the sub-tests have their own
test-results directories, so this is no longer an issue. We
can now update a few comments that are no longer accurate
nor necessary.
We can also revisit the choice of HARNESS_ACTIVE. Since we
must choose one value for stability, it's probably saner to
have it off. This means that future patches could test
things like the test-results writing, or the "--quiet"
option, which is currently ignored when run under a harness.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
---
I do not have any plans to write such tests, and I'd be OK if we wanted
to stop this just at fixing up the comments. But it took me a while to
figure out what is going on, and I believe unsetting HARNESS_ACTIVE in
the sub-tests is the choice that is least likely to cause somebody in
the future to have to re-figure it out. :)
t/t0000-basic.sh | 14 +++++---------
t/test-lib.sh | 2 --
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t0000-basic.sh b/t/t0000-basic.sh
index bc4e3e2..e6c5b63 100755
--- a/t/t0000-basic.sh
+++ b/t/t0000-basic.sh
@@ -50,11 +50,11 @@ run_sub_test_lib_test () {
shift 2
mkdir "$name" &&
(
- # Pretend we're a test harness. This prevents
- # test-lib from writing the counts to a file that will
- # later be summarized, showing spurious "failed" tests
- HARNESS_ACTIVE=t &&
- export HARNESS_ACTIVE &&
+ # Pretend we're not running under a test harness, whether we
+ # are or not. The test-lib output depends on the setting of
+ # this variable, so we need a stable setting under which to run
+ # the sub-test.
+ sane_unset HARNESS_ACTIVE &&
cd "$name" &&
cat >"$name.sh" <<-EOF &&
#!$SHELL_PATH
@@ -235,16 +235,13 @@ test_expect_success 'test --verbose' '
grep -v "^Initialized empty" test-verbose/out+ >test-verbose/out &&
check_sub_test_lib_test test-verbose <<-\EOF
> expecting success: true
- > Z
> ok 1 - passing test
> Z
> expecting success: echo foo
> foo
- > Z
> ok 2 - test with output
> Z
> expecting success: false
- > Z
> not ok 3 - failing test
> # false
> Z
@@ -267,7 +264,6 @@ test_expect_success 'test --verbose-only' '
> Z
> expecting success: echo foo
> foo
- > Z
> ok 2 - test with output
> Z
> not ok 3 - failing test
diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
index 1cf78d5..1531c24 100644
--- a/t/test-lib.sh
+++ b/t/test-lib.sh
@@ -481,8 +481,6 @@ test_at_end_hook_ () {
test_done () {
GIT_EXIT_OK=t
- # Note: t0000 relies on $HARNESS_ACTIVE disabling the .counts
- # output file
if test -z "$HARNESS_ACTIVE"
then
test_results_dir="$TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY/test-results"
--
1.8.5.1.399.g900e7cd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-28 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-28 9:27 [PATCH 0/3] t0000 cleanups Jeff King
2013-12-28 9:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] t0000: set TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY for sub-tests Jeff King
2013-12-28 22:13 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-12-28 22:20 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-12-29 7:17 ` Jeff King
2013-12-28 9:31 ` Jeff King [this message]
2013-12-28 22:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] t0000: simplify HARNESS_ACTIVE hack Jonathan Nieder
2013-12-28 9:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] t0000: drop "known breakage" test Jeff King
2013-12-28 20:51 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-12-29 7:22 ` Jeff King
2013-12-28 22:21 ` [PATCH 0/3] t0000 cleanups Jonathan Nieder
2013-12-30 18:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-12-30 18:51 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-12-30 19:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-12-31 10:33 ` Jeff King
2014-01-02 22:28 ` Jonathan Nieder
2014-01-02 22:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-03 1:04 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131228093149.GB21109@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=john@keeping.me.uk \
--cc=tr@thomasrast.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).