git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] branch_get: provide per-branch pushremote pointers
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 06:09:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140108110919.GA3674@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140108102707.GA23145@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:27:07AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:

> This patch passes the test suite by itself (with or without that fixup).
> But oddly, it seems to fail t5531 when merged with 'next'. I can't
> figure out why, though. It shouldn't affect any code that doesn't look
> at branch->pushremote.

OK, I figured it out. My patch calls:

  remote_get("origin")

which creates an origin remote, even if one does not exist (it assumes
it to be a URL "origin"). Later, when we want to decide if the push is
triangular or not, we ask for:

  remote_get(NULL);

which will internally look for a remote called "origin". Before my patch
there was not such a remote, and so the push could not be triangular.
After my patch, it finds the bogus remote and says "this thing exists,
and is not what we are pushing to; therefore the push is triangular".

The solution is that I should not be passing the term "origin" to
remote_get, but rather passing NULL and relying on it to figure out the
default remote correctly. I.e.:

diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
index 8724388..d214fa2 100644
--- a/remote.c
+++ b/remote.c
@@ -1574,7 +1574,7 @@ struct branch *branch_get(const char *name)
 	else if (ret->remote_name)
 		ret->pushremote = remote_get(ret->remote_name);
 	else
-		ret->pushremote = remote_get("origin");
+		ret->pushremote = remote_get(NULL);
 
 	return ret;
 }

-Peff

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-08 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-07 20:29 [RFC/PATCH] format-patch: introduce branch.*.forkedFrom Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:30 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:40   ` Jeff King
2014-01-07 20:48     ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-07 21:02     ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 21:16       ` Jeff King
2014-01-07 21:35         ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-08  9:33           ` [RFC/PATCH 0/5] <branch>@{publish} shorthand Jeff King
2014-01-08  9:34             ` [PATCH 1/5] sha1_name: refactor upstream_mark Jeff King
2014-01-08  9:34             ` [PATCH 2/5] interpret_branch_name: factor out upstream handling Jeff King
2014-01-08 12:37               ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-08  9:35             ` [PATCH 3/5] branch_get: return early on error Jeff King
2014-01-08  9:35             ` [PATCH 4/5] branch_get: provide per-branch pushremote pointers Jeff King
2014-01-08 10:27               ` Jeff King
2014-01-08 10:47                 ` [PATCH] t5531: further "matching" fixups Jeff King
2014-01-10 23:34                   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-11  4:22                     ` Jeff King
2014-01-08 11:09                 ` Jeff King [this message]
2014-01-08  9:37             ` [PATCH 5/5] implement @{publish} shorthand Jeff King
2014-01-08 23:42               ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-09 18:20                 ` Jeff King
2014-01-09 21:24                   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-09  8:39               ` Philip Oakley
2014-01-09 22:03                 ` Jeff King
2014-01-09 22:24                 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-24  0:16               ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-24 21:35                 ` Jeff King
2014-01-24 22:05                   ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-24 23:12                     ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-15 11:50                   ` Philip Oakley
2014-02-18  8:52                     ` Jeff King
2014-02-18 13:10                       ` Johan Herland
2014-02-18 19:52                       ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-08 12:40             ` [RFC/PATCH 0/5] <branch>@{publish} shorthand Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:36 ` [RFC/PATCH] format-patch: introduce branch.*.forkedFrom Junio C Hamano
2014-01-07 20:40   ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:42     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140108110919.GA3674@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).