From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>,
Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t5531: further "matching" fixups
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 23:22:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140111042246.GA19556@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqzjn376n0.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 03:34:59PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>
> > ... but the
> > failing test is actually somewhat broken in 'next' already.
>
> Hmph, in what way? I haven't seen t5531 breakage on 'next', with or
> without your series...
The test still passes, but it is not testing the right thing anymore.
On 'next', run t5531. Test 6 is "push fails when commit on
multiple branches if one branch has no remote" and ends with:
test_must_fail git push --recurse-submodules=check ../pub.git
But the output ends with:
warning: push.default is unset; its implicit value has changed in
Git 2.0 from 'matching' to 'simple'. To squelch this message
[...]
fatal: The current branch branch2 has no upstream branch.
To push the current branch and set the remote as upstream, use
git push --set-upstream ../pub.git branch2
When not merged with b2ed944 (push: switch default from "matching" to
"simple"), or with my patch to set push.default=matching explicitly, the
output is:
The following submodule paths contain changes that can
not be found on any remote:
gar/bage
Please try
git push --recurse-submodules=on-demand
or cd to the path and use
git push
to push them to a remote.
fatal: Aborting.
which is what the test is actually trying to check. So the push fails,
as we expect, but not for the right reason.
My other series for @{publish} had a bug that caused the push to
succeed. So that series was buggy (and I posted the fix already), but we
only noticed it because this test was not working (it should not care
about upstream/triangular config at all, but it accidentally did).
Does that clarify the situation?
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-11 4:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-07 20:29 [RFC/PATCH] format-patch: introduce branch.*.forkedFrom Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:30 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:40 ` Jeff King
2014-01-07 20:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-07 21:02 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 21:16 ` Jeff King
2014-01-07 21:35 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-08 9:33 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/5] <branch>@{publish} shorthand Jeff King
2014-01-08 9:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] sha1_name: refactor upstream_mark Jeff King
2014-01-08 9:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] interpret_branch_name: factor out upstream handling Jeff King
2014-01-08 12:37 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-08 9:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] branch_get: return early on error Jeff King
2014-01-08 9:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] branch_get: provide per-branch pushremote pointers Jeff King
2014-01-08 10:27 ` Jeff King
2014-01-08 10:47 ` [PATCH] t5531: further "matching" fixups Jeff King
2014-01-10 23:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-11 4:22 ` Jeff King [this message]
2014-01-08 11:09 ` [PATCH 4/5] branch_get: provide per-branch pushremote pointers Jeff King
2014-01-08 9:37 ` [PATCH 5/5] implement @{publish} shorthand Jeff King
2014-01-08 23:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-09 18:20 ` Jeff King
2014-01-09 21:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-09 8:39 ` Philip Oakley
2014-01-09 22:03 ` Jeff King
2014-01-09 22:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-24 0:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-24 21:35 ` Jeff King
2014-01-24 22:05 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-24 23:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-15 11:50 ` Philip Oakley
2014-02-18 8:52 ` Jeff King
2014-02-18 13:10 ` Johan Herland
2014-02-18 19:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-08 12:40 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/5] <branch>@{publish} shorthand Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:36 ` [RFC/PATCH] format-patch: introduce branch.*.forkedFrom Junio C Hamano
2014-01-07 20:40 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:42 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140111042246.GA19556@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).