git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>,
	Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t5531: further "matching" fixups
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 23:22:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140111042246.GA19556@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqzjn376n0.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 03:34:59PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > ... but the
> > failing test is actually somewhat broken in 'next' already.
> 
> Hmph, in what way?  I haven't seen t5531 breakage on 'next', with or
> without your series...

The test still passes, but it is not testing the right thing anymore.

On 'next', run t5531. Test 6 is "push fails when commit on
multiple branches if one branch has no remote" and ends with:

  test_must_fail git push --recurse-submodules=check ../pub.git

But the output ends with:

  warning: push.default is unset; its implicit value has changed in
  Git 2.0 from 'matching' to 'simple'. To squelch this message
  [...]

  fatal: The current branch branch2 has no upstream branch.
  To push the current branch and set the remote as upstream, use

      git push --set-upstream ../pub.git branch2

When not merged with b2ed944 (push: switch default from "matching" to
"simple"), or with my patch to set push.default=matching explicitly, the
output is:

  The following submodule paths contain changes that can
  not be found on any remote:
    gar/bage

  Please try

          git push --recurse-submodules=on-demand

  or cd to the path and use

          git push

  to push them to a remote.

  fatal: Aborting.

which is what the test is actually trying to check. So the push fails,
as we expect, but not for the right reason.

My other series for @{publish} had a bug that caused the push to
succeed. So that series was buggy (and I posted the fix already), but we
only noticed it because this test was not working (it should not care
about upstream/triangular config at all, but it accidentally did).

Does that clarify the situation?

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-11  4:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-07 20:29 [RFC/PATCH] format-patch: introduce branch.*.forkedFrom Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:30 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:40   ` Jeff King
2014-01-07 20:48     ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-07 21:02     ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 21:16       ` Jeff King
2014-01-07 21:35         ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-08  9:33           ` [RFC/PATCH 0/5] <branch>@{publish} shorthand Jeff King
2014-01-08  9:34             ` [PATCH 1/5] sha1_name: refactor upstream_mark Jeff King
2014-01-08  9:34             ` [PATCH 2/5] interpret_branch_name: factor out upstream handling Jeff King
2014-01-08 12:37               ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-08  9:35             ` [PATCH 3/5] branch_get: return early on error Jeff King
2014-01-08  9:35             ` [PATCH 4/5] branch_get: provide per-branch pushremote pointers Jeff King
2014-01-08 10:27               ` Jeff King
2014-01-08 10:47                 ` [PATCH] t5531: further "matching" fixups Jeff King
2014-01-10 23:34                   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-11  4:22                     ` Jeff King [this message]
2014-01-08 11:09                 ` [PATCH 4/5] branch_get: provide per-branch pushremote pointers Jeff King
2014-01-08  9:37             ` [PATCH 5/5] implement @{publish} shorthand Jeff King
2014-01-08 23:42               ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-09 18:20                 ` Jeff King
2014-01-09 21:24                   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-09  8:39               ` Philip Oakley
2014-01-09 22:03                 ` Jeff King
2014-01-09 22:24                 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-24  0:16               ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-24 21:35                 ` Jeff King
2014-01-24 22:05                   ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-24 23:12                     ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-15 11:50                   ` Philip Oakley
2014-02-18  8:52                     ` Jeff King
2014-02-18 13:10                       ` Johan Herland
2014-02-18 19:52                       ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-08 12:40             ` [RFC/PATCH 0/5] <branch>@{publish} shorthand Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:36 ` [RFC/PATCH] format-patch: introduce branch.*.forkedFrom Junio C Hamano
2014-01-07 20:40   ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:42     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140111042246.GA19556@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).