From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Keith Derrick <keith.derrick@lge.com>,
"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] interpret_branch_name bug potpourri
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 03:25:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140115082528.GA18974@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140115050003.GA27237@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:00:03AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> $ git rev-parse --symbolic-full-name HEAD@{u}
> refs/remotes/origin/master
> $ git rev-parse --symbolic-full-name @mybranch@{u}
> @mybranch@{u}
> fatal: ambiguous argument '@mybranch@{u}': unknown revision or path
> not in the working tree.
>
> So I do think there is a bug. The interpret_branch_name parser somehow
> gets confused by the "@" in the name.
The "somehow" is because we only look for the first "@", and never
consider any possible marks after that. The series below fixes it, along
with two other bugs I found while looking at this code. Ugh. Remind me
never to look at our object name parser ever again.
I feel pretty good that this is fixing real bugs and not regressing
anything else. I would not be surprised if there are other weird things
lurking, though. See the discussion in patch 4.
[1/5]: interpret_branch_name: factor out upstream handling
[2/5]: interpret_branch_name: rename "cp" variable to "at"
[3/5]: interpret_branch_name: always respect "namelen" parameter
[4/5]: interpret_branch_name: avoid @{upstream} past colon
[5/5]: interpret_branch_name: find all possible @-marks
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-15 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-14 23:04 BUG: check-ref-format and rev-parse can not handle branches with an @ in their name combined with @{u} Keith Derrick
2014-01-14 23:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-15 5:00 ` Jeff King
2014-01-15 7:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-15 7:47 ` Jeff King
2014-01-15 8:25 ` Jeff King [this message]
2014-01-15 8:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] interpret_branch_name: factor out upstream handling Jeff King
2014-01-15 8:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] interpret_branch_name: rename "cp" variable to "at" Jeff King
2014-01-15 8:31 ` [PATCH 3/5] interpret_branch_name: always respect "namelen" parameter Jeff King
2014-01-15 8:37 ` [PATCH 4/5] interpret_branch_name: avoid @{upstream} past colon Jeff King
2014-01-15 8:40 ` [PATCH 5/5] interpret_branch_name: find all possible @-marks Jeff King
2014-01-15 21:03 ` [PATCH 0/5] interpret_branch_name bug potpourri Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140115082528.GA18974@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=keith.derrick@lge.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).