From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: git quietly fails on https:// URL, https errors are never reported to user Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:18:58 -0500 Message-ID: <20140117201858.GA3362@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <52D7D017.107@rawbw.com> <20140116180310.GA27180@sigill.intra.peff.net> <52D8FAA6.1010601@rawbw.com> <20140117201325.GB775@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Yuri , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 17 21:19:07 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W4Fsg-00059r-Gv for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:19:06 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753513AbaAQUTB (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:19:01 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:34371 "HELO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752940AbaAQUTA (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:19:00 -0500 Received: (qmail 29660 invoked by uid 102); 17 Jan 2014 20:19:00 -0000 Received: from c-71-63-4-13.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.63.4.13) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:19:00 -0600 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:18:58 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140117201325.GB775@sigill.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 03:13:25PM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:43:35AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > Yuri writes: > > > > > I think that in a rare case of error this extra-printout wouldn't > > > hurt. > > > > If the "error is rare, extra verbiage does not hurt" were a valid > > attitude, "error is rare, non-zero exit is enough" would be equally > > valid ;-) > > I think the problem is that error is _not_ rare. For years, we did not > print the extra verbiage, and nobody complained. Then, within days of us > making a release that included the extra line, somebody complained[1]. Forgot my footnote here, but it was: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/228498 which led to 266f1fd (transport-helper: be quiet on read errors from helpers, 2013-06-21). -Peff