From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add a function skip_prefix_if_present() Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 12:26:51 -0500 Message-ID: <20140205172651.GC7268@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1391581517-8586-1-git-send-email-mhagger@alum.mit.edu> <52F1E04D.3090208@alum.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Junio C Hamano , "Kent R. Spillner" , =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Sixt , =?utf-8?B?UmVuw6k=?= Scharfe To: Michael Haggerty X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 05 18:27:00 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WB6FV-0007Np-QZ for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 18:26:58 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753176AbaBER0y convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2014 12:26:54 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:45114 "HELO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752964AbaBER0x (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2014 12:26:53 -0500 Received: (qmail 6223 invoked by uid 102); 5 Feb 2014 17:26:53 -0000 Received: from c-71-63-4-13.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.63.4.13) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:26:53 -0600 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:26:51 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52F1E04D.3090208@alum.mit.edu> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 07:55:09AM +0100, Michael Haggerty wrote: > * Ren=C3=A9 Scharfe submitted a patch to use a function parse_prefix(= ) > (originally suggested by Peff) instead of Duy's suggested approach: >=20 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/239569 >=20 > His patch appears to have been overlooked. >=20 > * Duy seemed to offer to rewrite his patch series, but I don't think > that it has happened yet. >=20 > And then the conversation was drowned by Christmas eggnog. >=20 > I don't have a strong feeling about (Duy's proposal plus my patches) = vs. > (Ren=C3=A9's parse_prefix() approach). But I definitely *do* like th= e idea > of getting rid of all those awkward magic numbers everywhere. =46WIW, after coming down off my eggnog bender, I think I still prefer Ren=C3=A9's (my?) approach. -Peff