From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] t3200-branch: test setting branch as own upstream Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 02:26:06 -0500 Message-ID: <20140228072606.GA622@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1393556659-32717-1-git-send-email-modocache@gmail.com> <20140228053703.GA32556@sigill.intra.peff.net> <531032DD.9000904@viscovery.net> <20140228071401.GA1229@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Brian Gesiak , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 28 08:26:15 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WJHpm-0002xK-Hd for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 08:26:14 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751123AbaB1H0J (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Feb 2014 02:26:09 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:58528 "HELO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750701AbaB1H0I (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Feb 2014 02:26:08 -0500 Received: (qmail 13137 invoked by uid 102); 28 Feb 2014 07:26:08 -0000 Received: from c-71-63-4-13.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.63.4.13) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 01:26:08 -0600 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 28 Feb 2014 02:26:06 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140228071401.GA1229@sigill.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 02:14:01AM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > I didn't think we bothered to make "sh -x" work robustly. I don't mind > if we do, but "git grep -E 'test_(i18n)?cmp .*err" shows many potential > problem spots. Just for fun: cd t make SHELL_PATH="sh -x" prove causes 326 test failures across 43 scripts. That's slightly misleading, because 200 of the failures are all in t0008, and updating one function would probably clear up all of them. -Peff