From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Charles Bailey <cbailey32@bloomberg.net>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t4212: handle systems with post-apocalyptic gmtime
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 17:57:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140326215741.GA17716@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140326212227.GC6991@hashpling.org>
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:22:27PM +0000, Charles Bailey wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 03:33:59PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> >
> > That being said, is the AIX value actually right? I did not look closely
> > at first, but just assumed that it was vaguely right. But:
> >
> > 999999999999999999 / (86400 * 365)
> >
> > is something like 31 billion years in the future, not 160 million.
> > A real date calculation will have a few tweaks (leap years, etc), but
> > that is orders of magnitude off.
>
> Well, this is embarrassing, while moving this through the corporate
> firewall (aka typing on one machine while looking at another), I
> munged the date. It still doesn't seem right but at least you can now
> see the actual data.
Hmm, so the year you got is actually: 1623969404. That still seems off
to me by a factor 20. I don't know if this is really worth digging into
that much further, but I wonder what you would get for timestamps of:
99999999999999999
9999999999999999
999999999999999
etc.
Do we start generating weird values at some particular size? Or is AIX
gmtime really more clever than I am, and is accounting for wobble of the
Earth or something over the next billion years?
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-26 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-24 7:33 [PATCH 0/5] handle bogus commit dates Jeff King
2014-02-24 7:36 ` [PATCH 1/5] t4212: test bogus timestamps with git-log Jeff King
2014-02-24 7:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] fsck: report integer overflow in author timestamps Jeff King
2014-02-24 7:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] date: check date overflow against time_t Jeff King
2014-02-24 7:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] log: handle integer overflow in timestamps Jeff King
2014-02-24 19:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-24 19:58 ` Jeff King
2014-02-24 20:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-24 20:37 ` Jeff King
2014-02-24 21:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-24 7:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] log: do not segfault on gmtime errors Jeff King
2014-03-22 9:32 ` René Scharfe
2014-03-24 21:33 ` Jeff King
2014-03-24 22:03 ` René Scharfe
2014-03-24 22:11 ` Jeff King
2014-03-26 11:05 ` Charles Bailey
2014-03-26 18:21 ` Jeff King
2014-03-26 18:51 ` [PATCH] t4212: handle systems with post-apocalyptic gmtime Jeff King
2014-03-26 19:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-26 19:25 ` Jeff King
2014-03-26 19:33 ` Jeff King
2014-03-26 19:40 ` Jeff King
2014-03-26 20:36 ` Charles Bailey
2014-03-26 20:38 ` Jeff King
2014-03-26 20:41 ` Charles Bailey
2014-03-26 21:22 ` Charles Bailey
2014-03-26 21:57 ` Jeff King [this message]
2014-03-26 22:46 ` Charles Bailey
2014-03-27 22:48 ` Jeff King
2014-03-28 16:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-28 18:47 ` Jeff King
2014-03-28 19:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-28 19:05 ` Jeff King
2014-03-28 19:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-01 7:38 ` Jeff King
2014-04-01 7:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] date: recognize bogus FreeBSD gmtime output Jeff King
2014-04-01 17:42 ` René Scharfe
2014-04-01 19:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-01 21:17 ` René Scharfe
2014-04-01 21:28 ` Jeff King
2014-04-01 7:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] t4212: loosen far-in-future test for AIX Jeff King
2014-04-01 7:45 ` [PATCH 2alt/2] work around unreliable gmtime errors on AIX Jeff King
2014-04-01 19:07 ` [PATCH] t4212: handle systems with post-apocalyptic gmtime Junio C Hamano
2014-04-01 19:46 ` Jeff King
2014-03-26 18:58 ` [PATCH 5/5] log: do not segfault on gmtime errors Junio C Hamano
2014-03-26 19:01 ` Jeff King
2014-03-26 21:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-26 21:09 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140326215741.GA17716@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=cbailey32@bloomberg.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).