From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Dragos Foianu <dragos.foianu@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] describe: rewrite name_rev() iteratively
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:50:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140408185047.GA7073@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1396824434-31672-1-git-send-email-dragos.foianu@gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:47:14AM +0300, Dragos Foianu wrote:
> The "git describe --contains" command uses the name_rev() function which
> is currently a recursive function. This causes a Stack Overflow when the
> history is large enough.
>
> Rewrite name_rev iteratively using a stack on the heap. This slightly
> reduces performance due to the extra operations on the heap, but the
> function no longer overflows the stack.
You can avoid the heap overhead by using an array for your stack, and
only resizing it when necessary. Like this:
struct rev_stack {
int nr, alloc;
struct rev_data *data;
};
static struct rev_data *rev_stack_push(struct rev_stack *stack)
{
ALLOC_GROW(stack->data, stack->nr + 1, stack->alloc);
return &stack->data[stack->nr++];
}
static void rev_stack_pop(struct rev_stack *stack)
{
stack->nr--;
}
static void rev_stack_init(struct rev_stack *stack)
{
stack->nr = stack->alloc = 0;
stack->data = NULL;
}
static void rev_stack_release(struct rev_stack *stack)
{
free(stack->data);
rev_stack_init(stack);
}
Usage would be something like:
struct rev_data *data = rev_stack_push(&stack);
data->commit = commit;
data->tip_name = tip_name;
...
IOW, you push first to allocate the space, and then do your
make_rev_data, rather than the other way around.
The downside is that your allocation is always as big as the deepest
recursion so far, so you hold on to the memory a little longer than
necessary. I think that's a good tradeoff versus an extra malloc() for
every commit.
-Peff
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-08 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-06 22:47 [PATCH] describe: rewrite name_rev() iteratively Dragos Foianu
2014-04-08 7:41 ` Eric Sunshine
2014-04-08 18:50 ` Jeff King [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140408185047.GA7073@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=dragos.foianu@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).