From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Richard Hansen <rhansen@bbn.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, sitaramc@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [SECURITY PATCH] git-prompt.sh: don't put unsanitized branch names in $PS1
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:24:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140421202454.GA6062@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398107248-32140-1-git-send-email-rhansen@bbn.com>
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 03:07:28PM -0400, Richard Hansen wrote:
> Both bash and zsh subject the value of PS1 to parameter expansion,
> command substitution, and arithmetic expansion. Rather than include
> the raw, unescaped branch name in PS1 when running in two- or
> three-argument mode, construct PS1 to reference a variable that holds
> the branch name. Because the shells do not recursively expand, this
> avoids arbitrary code execution by specially-crafted branch names such
> as '$(IFS=_;cmd=sudo_rm_-rf_/;$cmd)'.
Cute. We already disallow quite a few characters in refnames (including
space, as you probably discovered), and generally enforce that during
ref transfer. I wonder if we should tighten that more as a precuation.
It would be backwards-incompatible, but I wonder if things like "$" and
";" in refnames are actually useful to people.
Did you look into similar exploits with completion? That's probably
slightly less dire (this one hits you as soon as you "cd" into a
malicious clone, whereas completion problems require you to actually hit
<tab>). I'm fairly sure that we miss some quoting on pathnames, for
example. That can lead to bogus completion, but I'm not sure offhand if
it can lead to execution.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-21 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-21 19:07 [SECURITY PATCH] git-prompt.sh: don't put unsanitized branch names in $PS1 Richard Hansen
2014-04-21 20:24 ` Jeff King [this message]
2014-04-21 21:07 ` Richard Hansen
2014-04-22 8:38 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-04-22 17:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-22 18:38 ` Richard Hansen
2014-04-22 19:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-21 22:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-21 22:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-21 22:58 ` Richard Hansen
2014-04-21 23:53 ` [SECURITY PATCH v2] " Richard Hansen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-04-24 18:40 [SECURITY PATCH] " Gábor Szeder
2014-04-25 7:37 ` Simon Oosthoek
2014-04-25 16:39 ` Richard Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140421202454.GA6062@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rhansen@bbn.com \
--cc=sitaramc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).