From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Stepan Kasal <kasal@ucw.cz>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
git@vger.kernel.org,
Jean-Jacques Lafay <jeanjacques.lafay@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] git tag --contains : avoid stack overflow
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:16:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140423191628.GA20596@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqeh0nzwq9.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:12:14PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > +ulimit_stack="ulimit -s 64"
> > +test_lazy_prereq ULIMIT 'bash -c "'"$ulimit_stack"'"'
>
> With this implementaion, ULIMIT implies bash, and we use bash that
> appears on user's PATH that may not be the one the user chose to run
> git with. Can't we fix both of them by using $SHELL_PATH?
I don't think so. The point is that we _must_ use bash here, not any
POSIX shell. So my $SHELL_PATH is /bin/sh, which is dash, and would not
run the test.
We want to run "some bash" if we can. We may pick a bash on the user's
PATH that is not what they put into $SHELL_PATH, but that should be
relatively rare. And the consequence is that either that bash works fine
and we run the test, or it does not, and we skip the test.
> How about doing it along this line instead?
>
> run_with_limited_stack () {
> "$SHELL_PATH" -c "ulimit -s 64 && $*"
> }
>
> test_lazy_prereq ULIMIT "run_with_limited_stack true"
That's a much more direct test. I like it (aside from the $SHELL_PATH
thing as described above).
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-23 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-16 14:15 [PATCH] git tag --contains : avoid stack overflow Stepan Kasal
2014-04-16 15:46 ` Jeff King
2014-04-17 17:31 ` Johannes Schindelin
2014-04-17 21:32 ` Jeff King
2014-04-17 21:52 ` Johannes Schindelin
2014-04-17 21:58 ` Jeff King
2014-04-23 7:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Stepan Kasal
2014-04-23 14:28 ` Johannes Schindelin
2014-04-23 15:45 ` Stepan Kasal
2014-04-23 19:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-23 19:16 ` Jeff King [this message]
2014-04-23 20:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-23 20:55 ` Jeff King
2014-04-23 21:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-24 12:20 ` Stepan Kasal
2014-04-24 12:24 ` [PATCH v3] git tag --contains: " Stepan Kasal
2014-04-25 5:54 ` Jeff King
2014-09-20 18:18 ` Andreas Schwab
2014-09-23 16:05 ` Jeff King
2014-09-23 21:48 ` Andreas Schwab
2014-09-23 22:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-23 19:59 ` [PATCH v2] git tag --contains : " Stepan Kasal
2014-04-23 19:17 ` Jeff King
2014-04-23 21:14 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140423191628.GA20596@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jeanjacques.lafay@gmail.com \
--cc=kasal@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).