From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: What is missing from Git v2.0 Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:57:31 -0400 Message-ID: <20140425185731.GA31454@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <5358ca1a55a69_1f7b143d3101c@nysa.notmuch> <20140424134106.GA27035@thunk.org> <20140424195559.GA1336@luc-arch> <5359c9d612298_771c15f72f02a@nysa.notmuch> <20140425133520.GC11124@thunk.org> <535a9f375e196_3984aa530c46@nysa.notmuch> <20140425182459.GA29329@sigill.intra.peff.net> <535aa905cd59c_44cee6530ccb@nysa.notmuch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Theodore Ts'o , Philippe Vaucher , Javier Domingo Cansino , Git Mailing List To: Felipe Contreras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 25 20:57:44 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WdlJd-00031b-PZ for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 20:57:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754039AbaDYS5f (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:57:35 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:38518 "HELO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753900AbaDYS5d (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:57:33 -0400 Received: (qmail 22194 invoked by uid 102); 25 Apr 2014 18:57:33 -0000 Received: from c-71-63-4-13.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.63.4.13) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 13:57:33 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:57:31 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <535aa905cd59c_44cee6530ccb@nysa.notmuch> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 01:27:17PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > I specifically said everybody agreed to "move away from the name 'index'", I > didn't say everybody agreed on the "staged area" although the vast majority > did, and I didn't say anybody agreed on my patches, although some did. > > I think I was clear. Maybe I was not clear in my response, so let me try again. I do _not_ necessarily agree that we need to move away from the name index. I am specifically saying that your "everyone" includes my name explicitly, and that I do not agree with the statement you are attributing to it. -Peff