From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Wong Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] Remove 'git archimport' Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 08:59:37 +0000 Message-ID: <20140509085937.GA29347@dcvr.yhbt.net> References: <1399599203-13991-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <1399599203-13991-2-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <20140509055024.GB30674@dcvr.yhbt.net> <536c7f9089b77_182dd0d31084@nysa.notmuch> <20140509081507.GA26494@dcvr.yhbt.net> <536c939781d8b_2bf0e952f08@nysa.notmuch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , Martin Langhoff To: Felipe Contreras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 09 10:59:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wigee-0006Bb-7I for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 10:59:44 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753527AbaEII7j (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2014 04:59:39 -0400 Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net ([64.71.152.64]:37576 "EHLO dcvr.yhbt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752187AbaEII7h (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2014 04:59:37 -0400 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5127120945; Fri, 9 May 2014 08:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <536c939781d8b_2bf0e952f08@nysa.notmuch> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Felipe Contreras wrote: > As a minimal token that anybody might possibly be using it, I would like > to see it work at least once. Since you said you have arch repos, can > you confirm that it does something? Those repos are in offline/offsite storage and I do not have time to retrieve them. I've forgotten how to use tla to get a public repo, even. > Eric Wong wrote: > > No, I am not convinced existing foreign SCM tools should move > > out-of-tree. Perhaps something like the following would be helpful: > > Tell that to Junio. > > If tools like git-remote-hg with tests and active maintanance and many > users cannot be in the core, why should 'git archimport' be? Perhaps it's easier to deal with a benign, unmaintained tool than to deal with you as a maintainer? > Would you at least be OK with a demotion to contrib/? I don't see the point of moving it around, even.