From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] format-patch --signature-file Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 13:00:10 -0400 Message-ID: <20140521170010.GE2040@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1400572806-21092-1-git-send-email-jmmahler@gmail.com> <1400572806-21092-2-git-send-email-jmmahler@gmail.com> <20140520082740.GB27590@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20140520182443.GA30533@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20140521164255.GA2040@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20140521165543.GA3743@hudson.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 To: Jeremiah Mahler , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 21 19:00:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wn9sJ-0000OA-AR for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 19:00:19 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752239AbaEURAN (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2014 13:00:13 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:56638 "HELO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752066AbaEURAM (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2014 13:00:12 -0400 Received: (qmail 21482 invoked by uid 102); 21 May 2014 17:00:11 -0000 Received: from c-71-63-4-13.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.63.4.13) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 21 May 2014 12:00:11 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 21 May 2014 13:00:10 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140521165543.GA3743@hudson.localdomain> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 09:55:43AM -0700, Jeremiah Mahler wrote: > I am fine with including your previous patch. I think that would be my preference, but we'll see what Junio says. > Would like me to test it out and create another patch set? Yeah, that would be the logical next step. I think the only thing you should need to adjust in your patch is to strip only one line from the output, rather than two. -Peff