git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@gmail.com>
To: Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wording fixes in the user manual and glossary
Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 01:37:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140525083720.GA28739@hudson.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5381A239.2060809@gmail.com>

On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 07:56:41PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
> On 25/05/14 15:50, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
> > Some minor wording fixes in the user manual and glossary.
...
> >  
> > -Eventually the developer cloned from will do additional work in her
> > +Eventually the developer will do additional work in her cloned
> >  repository, creating new commits and advancing the branches to point
> >  at the new commits.
> 
> I agree that the original wording isn't clear but I'm not sure the new
> wording is any clearer. The paragraph is trying to explain how to fetch
> upstream changes when they happen. My initial thought was to say
> "Eventually the developer will do additional work in the upstream
> repository" but perhaps it is to early to start throwing around terms
> like upstream. Perhaps just saying "her repository" would be clearest.
> 

The "developer cloned from will do" didn't sound right to me.
But it sounds like my interpretation is not what you were trying to
convey.  I do like the "upstream" term, it helps describe the
local/remote aspect.

How about this:

  Eventually the upstream developer will do additional work in their
  repository.  Creating new commits and advancing the branches to point
  at the new commits.

Then in the next paragraph it will discuss how to use `git fetch`
to get these remote changes in to the local repository.

-- 
Jeremiah Mahler
jmmahler@gmail.com
http://github.com/jmahler

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-25  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-25  3:50 [PATCH] wording fixes in the user manual and glossary Jeremiah Mahler
2014-05-25  7:56 ` Chris Packham
2014-05-25  8:37   ` Jeremiah Mahler [this message]
2014-05-26  7:50     ` Chris Packham
2014-05-26  8:11       ` Ben Aveling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140525083720.GA28739@hudson.localdomain \
    --to=jmmahler@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=judge.packham@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).